全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...
PLOS ONE  2014 

Childhood Adversity Accelerates Intended Reproductive Timing in Adolescent Girls without Increasing Interest in Infants

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085013

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Women experiencing greater childhood adversity exhibit faster reproductive trajectories. One possible psychological mechanism underlying this phenomenon is an increased interest in infants. Interest in infants is thought to be an adaptation important for successful rearing as it motivates the acquisition of caretaking skills. We investigated the relationships between childhood adversity, intended reproductive timing and interest in infants in a sample of English adolescent girls. Specifically we sought to investigate the relationship between 1) childhood adversity and intended reproductive timing; 2) childhood adversity and interest in infants; and 3) intended reproductive timing and interest in infants. Additionally we explored different methods of measuring interest in infants using self-reported fondness for babies, a forced choice adult versus infant paper-based preference task and a novel computer based attention task using adult and infant stimuli. In total 357 girls aged nine to 14 years participated in the study, which took place in schools. Participants completed the two interest in infants tasks before moving on to a childhood adversity questionnaire. Girls with more childhood adversity reported earlier ideal ages at parenthood. We found some evidence that, contrary to our predictions, girls with less childhood adversity were more interested in infants. There was no relationship between intended reproductive timing and interest in infants. The different measurements for interest in infants were only weakly related, if at all, highlighting the complexity of measuring this construct. Our findings suggest that rather than interest in infants being a mechanism for the effect of childhood adversity on early reproductive timing it might instead be an indicator of future reproductive strategies.

References

[1]  Belsky J, Steinberg L, Draper P (1991) Childhood Experience, Interpersonal Development, and Reproductive Strategy: An Evolutionary Theory of Socialization. Child Dev 62: 647–670.
[2]  Ellis BJ, Figueredo AJ, Brumbach BH, Schlomer GL (2009) Fundamental Dimensions of Environmental Risk: The Impact of Harsh versus Unpredictable Environments on the Evolution and Development of Life History Strategies. Hum Nat 20: 204–268.
[3]  Chisholm JS, Ellison PT, Evans J, Lee PC, Lieberman LS, et al. (1993) Death, Hope, and Sex: Life-History Theory and the Development of Reproductive Strategies. Curr Anthropol 34: 1–24.
[4]  Draper P, Harpending H (1982) Father Absence and Reproductive Strategy: An Evolutionary Perspective. J Anthropol Res 38: 255–273.
[5]  Barber N (2001) Marital Opportunity, Parental Investment, and Teen Birth Rates of Blacks and Whites in American States. Cross-cultural Res 35: 263–279.
[6]  Wellings K, Wadsworth J, Johnson A, Field J, Macdowall W (1999) Teenage fertility and life chances. Rev Reprod 4: 184–190.
[7]  Nettle D, Coall DA, Dickins TE (2010) Early-life conditions and age at first pregnancy in British women. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 278: 1721–1727.
[8]  Ellis BJ, Bates JE, Dodge KA, Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, et al. (2003) Does Father Absence Place Daughters at Special Risk for Early Sexual Activity and Teenage Pregnancy? Child Dev 74: 801–821.
[9]  Nettle D, Coall DA, Dickins TE (2010) Birthweight and Paternal Involvement Predict Early Reproduction in British Women: Evidence from the National Child Development Study. Am J Hum Biol 22: 172–179.
[10]  Seamark CJ, Pereira Gray DJ (1997) Like mother, like daughter: a general practice study of maternal influences on teenage. Br J Gen Pract 47: 175–176.
[11]  Wilson M, Daly M (1997) Life Expectancy, Economic Inequality, Homicide, and Reproductive Timing in Chicago Neighbourhoods. BMJ Br Med J 314: 1271–1274.
[12]  Nettle D (2011) Flexibility in reproductive timing in human females: Integrating ultimate and proximate explanations. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 366: 357–365.
[13]  Johns SE (2010) Perceived environmental risk as a predictor of teenage motherhood in a British population. Health Place 17: 122–131.
[14]  McCulloch A (2001) Teenage childbearing in Great Britain and the spatial concentration of poverty households. J Epidemiol Community Health 55: 16–23.
[15]  Nettle D, Cockerill M (2010) Development of Social Variation in Reproductive Schedules: A Study from an English Urban Area. PLoS One 5: e12690.
[16]  Blell M, Pollard TM, Pearce MS (2008) Predictors of Age at Menarche in the Newcastle Thousand Families Study. J Biosoc Sci 40: 563–575.
[17]  Romans SE, Martin JM, Gendall K, Herbison GP (2003) Age of menarche: the role of some psychosocial factors. Psychol Med 33: 933–939.
[18]  Ellis BJ, Garber J (2000) Psychosocial Antecedents of Variation in Girls' Pubertal Timing: Maternal Depression, Stepfather Presence, and Marital and Family Stress. Child Dev 71: 485–501.
[19]  Kim K, Smith PK (1998) Childhood stress, behavioural symptoms and mother-daughter pubertal development. J Adolesc 21: 231–240.
[20]  Maestripieri D, Roney JR, DeBias N, Durante KM, Spaepen GM (2004) Father absence, menarche and interest in infants among adolescent girls. Dev Sci 7: 560–566.
[21]  Maestripieri D, Roney J (2006) Evolutionary developmental psychology: Contributions from comparative research with nonhuman primates. Dev Rev 26: 120–137.
[22]  Fairbanks L (1990) Reciprocal benefits of allomothering for female vervet monkeys. Anim Behav 553–562.
[23]  Blakemore JE (1981) Age and Sex Differences in Interaction with a Human Infant. Child Dev 52: 386–388.
[24]  Feldman SS, Churnin Nash S, Cutrona C (1977) The Influence of Age and Sex on Responsivenes to Babies. Dev Psychol 13: 675–676.
[25]  Frodi AM, Lamb ME (1978) Sex Differences in Responsiveness to Infants: A Developmental Study of Psychophysiological and Behavioral Responses. Child Dev 49: 1182–1188.
[26]  Fullard W, Reiling AM (1976) An Investigation of Lorenz's “Babyness.”. Child Dev 47: 1191–1193.
[27]  Maestripieri D, Pelka S (2002) Sex Differences in Interest in Infants Across the Lifespan: A Biological Adaptation for Parenting? Hum Nat 13: 327–344.
[28]  Lorenz K (1943) Die angeborenen formen m?glicher erfahrung. Z Tierpsychol 5: 235–409.
[29]  Glocker ML, Langleben DD, Ruparel K, Loughead JW, Valdez JN, et al. (2009) Baby schema modulates the brain reward system in nulliparous women. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 9115–9119.
[30]  Lobmaier JS, Sprengelmeyer R, Wiffen B, Perrett DI (2010) Female and male responses to cuteness, age and emotion in infant faces. Evol Hum Behav 31: 16–21.
[31]  Feldman SS, Churnin Nash S (1979) Changes in Responsiveness to Babies during Adolescence. Child Dev 50: 942–949.
[32]  Feldman SS, Churnin Nash S (1978) Interest in Babies during Young Adulthood. Child Dev 49: 617–622.
[33]  Frodi A, Murray A, Lamb M, Steinberg J (1984) Biological and Social Determinants of Responsiveness to Infants in 10-to-15-Year-Old Girls. Sex Roles 10: 639–649.
[34]  Blakemore JE (1985) Interaction with a Baby by Young Adults: A Comparison of Traditional and Feminist Men and Women. Sex Roles 13: 405–411.
[35]  Leibenluft E, Gobbini MI, Harrison T, Haxby JV (2004) Mothers' Neural Activation in Response to Pictures of Their Children and Other Children. Biol Psychiatry 56: 225–232.
[36]  Berman PW, Goodman V, Sloan VL, Fernander L (1978) Preference for Infants among Black and White Children: Sex and Age Differences. Child Dev 49: 917–919.
[37]  Berman PW, Cooper P, Mansfield P, Shields S, Abplanalp J (1975) Sex Differences in Attraction to Infants: When Do They Occur? Sex Roles 1: 311–318.
[38]  Glocker ML, Langleben DD, Ruparel K, Loughead JW, Gur RC, et al. (2009) Baby Schema in Infant Faces Induces Cuteness Perception and Motivation for Caretaking in Adults. Ethology 115: 257–263.
[39]  Brosch T, Sander D, Scherer KR (2007) That Baby Caught My Eye… Attention Capture by Infant Faces. Emotion 7: 685–689.
[40]  Parsons CE, Young KS, Kumari N, Stein A, Kringelbach ML (2011) The motivational salience of infant faces is similar for men and women. PLoS One 6: e20632.
[41]  Duchowski AT (2007) Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. Vol 373. 2nd ed. London: Springer.
[42]  Schmukle SC (2005) Unreliability of the Dot Probe Task. Eur J Pers 19: 595–605 doi:10.1002/per.554.
[43]  Yamamoto R, Ariely D, Chi W, Langleben DD, Elman I (2009) Gender differences in the motivational processing of babies are determined by their facial attractiveness. PLoS One 4: e6042.
[44]  Mclennan D, Barnes H, Noble M, Davies J, Garratt E, et al.. (2011) The English Indices of Deprivation 2010. London.
[45]  Mikach S (1999) What Distinguishes Women with Unusually High Numbers of Sex Partners? Evol Hum Behav 20: 141–150.
[46]  Elliott DS, Huizinga D, Ageton SS (1985) Explaining delinquency and drug use. Beverley Hills, California: Sage.
[47]  Harden A, Brunton G, Fletcher A, Oakley A (2009) Teenage pregnancy and social disadvantage: systematic review integrating controlled trials and qualitative studies. BMJ 339: b4254.
[48]  Russell ST (2002) Childhood Developmental Risk for Teen Childbearing in Britain. J Res Adolesc 12: 305–324.
[49]  Quinlan RJ (2003) Father absence, parental care, and female reproductive development. Evol Hum Behav 24: 376–390.
[50]  Steinberg L, Graham S, O'Brien L, Woolard J, Cauffman E, et al. (2009) Age differences in future orientation and delay discounting. Child Dev 80: 28–44.
[51]  Kiernan KE (1997) Becoming a young parent: a longitudinal study of associated factors. Br J Sociol 48: 406–428.
[52]  Sprengelmeyer R, Lewis J, Hahn A, Perrett DI (2013) Aesthetic and incentive salience of cute infant faces: studies of observer sex, oral contraception and menstrual cycle. PLoS One 8: e65844.
[53]  Berridge KC, Kringelbach ML (2008) Affective neuroscience of pleasure: reward in humans and animals. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 199: 457–480.
[54]  Buss DM, Schmitt DP (1993) Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolutionary Perspective on Human Mating. Psychol Rev 100: 204–232.
[55]  Nishitani S, Doi H, Koyama A, Shinohara K (2011) Differential prefrontal response to infant facial emotions in mothers compared with non-mothers. Neurosci Res 70: 183–188.
[56]  Thompson-Booth C, Viding E, Mayes LC, Rutherford HJV, Hodsoll S, et al. (2013) Here's looking at you, kid: attention to infant emotional faces in mothers and non-mothers. Dev Sci 17: 35–46 doi:10.1111/desc.12090.
[57]  Nettle D (2010) Dying young and living fast: variation in life history across English neighborhoods. Behav Ecol 21: 387–395.
[58]  Bottino MN, Nadanovsky P, Moraes CL, Reichenheim ME, Lobato G (2012) Reappraising the relationship between maternal age and postpartum depression according to the evolutionary theory: Empirical evidence from a survey in primary health services. J Affect Disord 142: 219–224.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133