We introduce a real-time experimentation testbed in this paper which enables more realistic analysis of quality of service (QoS) in LTE networks. This testbed is envisioned for the improvement of QoS and quality of experience (QoE) through the experimentation with real devices, services, and radio configurations. Radio configurations suggested in the literature typically arise from simulations; the testbed provides a real and controlled testing environment where such configurations can be validated. The added value of this testbed goes a long way not only in the provision of more realistic results but also in the provision of QoS and QoE cross-layer measurements through the correlation of information collected at different layers: from service and IP levels to radio and protocol parameters. Analyzing the interlayer dependencies will allow us to identify optimal settings for the radio access network and service parameters. This information can be used to suggest new cross-layer optimizations to further improve quality of experience of mobile subscribers. As a use case, we examine VoIP service over LTE, which is currently an open issue. 1. Introduction The enhancement of QoS in a sustainable manner is a critical goal for network operators as management tasks are becoming increasingly complex. Although some initial efforts have been carried out by the standardization bodies, there is still a significant gap to be covered in QoS and also in QoE optimization. Actually, current efforts towards improving QoS and QoE are typically based on estimations derived from costly drive test campaigns. Furthermore, involvement of human expertise is required to manually tune network configurations. On the other hand, most of the service and network configurations available in the literature are derived from simulations [1–6]. As is widely known, in the process of modeling communication systems to simulate them, some details may be missed, and thus, misleading results may be derived. For example, it is very common to find that the consumption of control resources is ignored when evaluating different scheduling methods. In this context, providing optimized network configurations based on measurements obtained directly from the subscribers' terminals and correlated with the information collected at the network will pave the way for a reduction of costs and more accurate tuning of network operation from the point of view of the QoS perceived by final users. Moreover, as stated by standards organizations (SDOs) or alliances with the participation of network operators such as
References
[1]
C. S. Bontu and E. Illidge, “DRX mechanism for power saving in LTE,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 48–55, 2009.
[2]
D. Jiang, H. Wang, E. Malkamaki, and E. Tuomaala, “Principle and performance of semi-persistent scheduling for VoIP in LTE system,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM '07), pp. 2861–2864, September 2007.
[3]
X. Mang, Y. Levy, C. Johnson, and D. Hoeflin, “Admission control for VoIP calls with heterogeneous codecs,” in Proceedings of the 18th Annual Wireless and Optical Communications Conference (WOCC '09), pp. 1–4, May 2009.
[4]
O. Fresan, T. Chen, K. Ranta-aho, and T. Ristaniemi, “Dynamic packet bundling for VoIP transmission over Rel'7 HSUPA with 10ms TTI length,” in Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium on Wireless Communication Systems (ISWCS '07), pp. 508–512, October 2007.
[5]
J. Puttonen, T. Henttonen, N. Kolehmainen, K. Aschan, M. Moisio, and P. Kela, “Voice-over-IP performance in UTRA long term evolution Downlink,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 67th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring '08), pp. 2502–2506, May 2008.
[6]
R. Susitaival and M. Meyer, “LTE coverage improvement by TTI bundling,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 69th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring '09), esp, April 2009.
[7]
NGMN, “NGMN top OPE recommendations version 1.0.21,” Tech. Rep., NGMN Alliance, 2010.
[8]
A. Diaz, P. Merino, and F. J. Rivas, “Test environment for QoS testing of VoIP over LTE,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Network Operations and Management Symposium (NOMS '12), pp. 780–794, 2012.
[9]
3GPP, “Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+), Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), Circuit Switched (CS) fallback in Evolved Packet System (EPS), stage 2,” TS 23.272.
[10]
GSMA, “Permanent Reference Document (PRD) IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS) profile for voice and SMS,” GSMA IR92, 2012.
[11]
V. Forum, “Voice over LTE via generic access, requirements specification, phase1,” TS 1.4.0, 2010.
M. Forum, “MSF VoLTE interoperability event 2011. Multivendor testing in global LTE and IMS Networks,” WhitePaper, 2011.
[14]
Epitiro, “LTE “Real World” Performance Study. Broadband and voice over LTE, (VoLTE) quality analysis: TeliaSonera,” Tech. Rep., Epitiro, 2011.
[15]
3GPP, “Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+), Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS), LTE, Services and service capabilities,” TS 22.105.
[16]
3GPP, “Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; IP Multimedia Subsystem (IMS); Multimedia telephony; Media handling and interaction,” TS 26.114.
[17]
A. T. Harri Holma, LTE for UMTS: Evolution to LTEAdvanced, chapter 8, Wiley, 2011.
[18]
3GPP, “LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA); Radio Resource Control (RRC); Protocol specification,” TS 36.331.
[19]
3GPP, “LTE; General Packet Radio Service (GPRS) enhancements for Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN) access,” TS 23.401.
[20]
3GPP, “LTE; Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (E-UTRA) and Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access Network (E-UTRAN); Overall description; stage 2,” TS 36.300.
[21]
3GPP, “Digital cellular telecommunications system (Phase 2+); Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); LTE; Policy and charging control architecture,” TS 23.203.
[22]
A. Díaz, P. Merino Gomez, and F. Rivas Tocado, “Mobile application profiling for connected mobile devices,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 54–61, 2010.
[23]
A. Alvarez, A. Diaz, P. Merino, and F. J. Rivas, “Field measurements of mobile services with android smartphones,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC '12), pp. 105–109, 2012.
[24]
I. T. U. -T, “Perceptual evaluation of speech quality (PESQ): an objective method for end-to-end speech quality assessment of narrow-band telephone networks and speech codecs,” Recommendation P.862.
[25]
3GPP, “Evolved Universal Terrestrial Radio Access (EUTRA); User Equipment (UE) conformance specification; radio transmission and reception; part 1: conformance testing,” Tech. Rep. 36.521-1, TS.
[26]
O. Heckmann, The Competitive Internet Service Provider: Network Architecture, Interconnection, Traffic Engineering and Network Design, Wiley, 2007, Edited by, D. Hutchison.
[27]
H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson, RTP: A Transport Protocol For Real-Time Applications, Internet Engineering Task Force, RFC.
[28]
A. Díaz, P. Merino, and A. Salmerón, “Obtaining models for realistic mobile network simulations using real traces,” IEEE Communications Letters, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 782–784, 2011.