全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Catalytic Sorption of (Chloro)Benzene and Naphthalene in Aqueous Solutions by Granular Activated Carbon Supported Bimetallic Iron and Palladium Nanoparticles

DOI: 10.1155/2013/525697

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Adsorption of benzene, chlorobenzene, and naphthalene on commercially available granular activated carbon (GAC) and bimetallic nanoparticle (Fe/Pd) loaded GAC was investigated for the potential use in active capping of contaminated sediments. Freundlich and Langmuir linearizations were both applied to this data, and it was found that the Freundlich model most closely fits the experimental data. Based on Freundlich parameters, the effective partitioning coefficients (L?kg?1) taking into account and were calculated to be and for benzene and chlorobenzene, respectively, on GAC. In addition, effective partitioning coefficients (L?kg?1) were 650, 5640, and for benzene, chlorobenzene, and naphthalene, respectively, on Fe/Pd/GAC. Values of were 6.11, 7.11, and 7.54 for benzene, chlorobenzene, and naphthalene, respectively, for GAC and 4.53, 5.47, and 5.22, respectively, for Fe/Pd/GAC. 1. Introduction Globally, sediment contamination is an immense problem in terms of environmental health and remediation costs. As countries continue to adopt more stringent environmental policies, more research and know-how is required to improve or even develop new sediment remediation techniques and understand the fate and transport of contaminants in benthic settings. Contaminated sediments represent a common problem due to their tendency to sequester hazardous materials from different sources including point source municipal and industrial discharges, runoff from urban areas, and contaminated groundwater flow. Sediments mainly consist of minerals and carbon; therefore, they can act as good sorbents for various inorganic and organic contaminants, which can remain long after the source of pollution has been removed. These contaminated solids are at equilibrium with the porewater in the sediments. It is from here that the hazardous materials can be reemitted through diffusion and advection into the overlying body to water. It is important to point out that porewater dissolved contaminants are bioavailable and available to partition into benthic organisms, which reside in the sediments. Furthermore, the contaminants can bioaccumulate into organisms from the tissue of these lower organisms, which may lead to an ecological and human health concern. Management of contaminated sediments is rather challenging because of the difficulty in assessing the best option among a plethora of options, which all have drawbacks and risks. The primary remedial options include environmental dredging, in situ capping, and natural recovery. Unfortunately, because of the complexity of the contaminated

References

[1]  W. Flynn, “Air quality case histories of an emerging issue for environmental dredging,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments, Batelle, Jacksonville, Fla, USA, 2009.
[2]  T. J. Estes, “Environmental dredging project costs—The Mystery, the Mystique, the Muddle,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments, Batelle, Savannah, Ga, USA, 2007.
[3]  U. F?rstner and S. E. Apitz, “State of the Art in the USA Sediment Remediation: U.S. focus on capping and monitored natural recovery,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Battelle Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments, pp. 351–358, Focus.
[4]  A. S. Knox and M. H. Paller, “Active caps for remediation of contaminants and resistance to erosion—field evaluation,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments, Batelle, Jacksonville, Fla, USA, 2009.
[5]  D. Reible, D. Lampert, D. Constant, R. D. Mutch Jr., and Y. Zhu, “Active capping demonstration in the Anacostia River, Washington, DC, USA,” Remediation Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 39–53, 2006.
[6]  A. M. P. Oen, B. Beckingham, U. Ghosh et al., “Sorption of organic compounds to fresh and field-aged activated carbons in soils and sediments,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 810–817, 2012.
[7]  A. D?browski, P. Podko?cielny, Z. Hubicki, and M. Barczak, “Adsorption of phenolic compounds by activated carbon—a critical review,” Chemosphere, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 1049–1070, 2005.
[8]  F. Haghseresht, S. Nouri, J. J. Finnerty, and G. Q. Lu, “Effects of surface chemistry on aromatic compound adsorption from dilute aqueous solutions by activated carbon,” Journal of Physical Chemistry B, vol. 106, no. 42, pp. 10935–10943, 2002.
[9]  H. Choi, S. Agarwal, and S. R. Al-Abed, “Adsorption and simultaneous dechlorination of PCBs on GAC/Fe/Pd: mechanistic aspects and reactive capping barrier concept,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 488–493, 2009.
[10]  B. P. Chaplin, M. Reinhard, W. F. Schneider et al., “Critical review of Pd-based catalytic treatment of priority contaminants in water,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 3655–3670, 2012.
[11]  H. L. Tierney, A. E. Baber, J. R. Kitchin, and E. C. H. Sykes, “Hydrogen dissociation and spillover on individual isolated palladium atoms,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 103, no. 24, Article ID 246102, 2009.
[12]  M. O. Nutt, J. B. Hughes, and M. S. Wong, “Designing Pd-on-Au bimetallic nanoparticle catalysts for trichloroethene hydrodechlorination,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1346–1353, 2005.
[13]  M. C. Ncibi, B. Mahjoub, and R. Gourdon, “Effects of aging on the extractability of naphthalene and phenanthrene from Mediterranean soils,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 146, no. 1-2, pp. 378–384, 2007.
[14]  N. Chung and M. Alexander, “Effect of concentration on sequestration and bioavailability of two polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 33, no. 20, pp. 3605–3608, 1999.
[15]  A. Aygün, S. Yenisoy-Karaka?, and I. Duman, “Production of granular activated carbon from fruit stones and nutshells and evaluation of their physical, chemical and adsorption properties,” Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, vol. 66, no. 2-3, pp. 189–195, 2003.
[16]  N. Wibowo, L. Setyadhi, D. Wibowo, J. Setiawan, and S. Ismadji, “Adsorption of benzene and toluene from aqueous solutions onto activated carbon and its acid and heat treated forms: influence of surface chemistry on adsorption,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 146, no. 1-2, pp. 237–242, 2007.
[17]  F. Villaca?as, M. F. R. Pereira, J. J. M. órf?o, and J. L. Figueiredo, “Adsorption of simple aromatic compounds on activated carbons,” Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, vol. 293, no. 1, pp. 128–136, 2006.
[18]  A. Kumar, S. Kumar, and S. Kumar, “Adsorption of resorcinol and catechol on granular activated carbon: equilibrium and kinetics,” Carbon, vol. 41, no. 15, pp. 3015–3025, 2003.
[19]  W. J. Weber Jr., Physicochemical Processes for Water Quality Control, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY, USA, 1972.
[20]  A. H. Mollah and C. W. Robinson, “Pentachlorophenol adsorption and desorption characteristics of granular activated carbon—I. Isotherms,” Water Research, vol. 30, no. 12, pp. 2901–2906, 1996.
[21]  R. G. Zytner, “Sorption of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes to various media,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 113–126, 1994.
[22]  S. Zhang, T. Shao, H. S. Kose, and T. Karanfil, “Adsorption kinetics of aromatic compounds on carbon nanotubes and activated carbons,” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 79–85, 2012.
[23]  S. Zhang, T. Shao, H. S. Kose, and K. Tanju, “Adsorption of aromatic compounds by carbonaceous adsorbents: a comparative study on granular activated carbon, activated carbon fiber, and carbon nanotubes,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 44, no. 16, pp. 6377–6383, 2010.
[24]  M. M. Dubinin, “Fundamentals of the theory of adsorption in micropores of carbon adsorbents: characteristics of their adsorption properties and microporous structures,” Carbon, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 457–467, 1989.
[25]  Q. Lu and G. A. Sorial, “Adsorption of phenolics on activated carbon—impact of pore size and molecular oxygen,” Chemosphere, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 671–679, 2004.
[26]  C. Valderrama, X. Gamisans, X. de las Heras, A. Farrán, and J. L. Cortina, “Sorption kinetics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons removal using granular activated carbon: intraparticle diffusion coefficients,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 157, no. 2-3, pp. 386–396, 2008.
[27]  K. Wagner and S. Schulz, “Adsorption of phenol, chlorophenols, and dihydroxybenzenes onto unfunctionalized polymeric resins at temperatures from 294.15 K to 318.15 K,” Journal of Chemical and Engineering Data, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 322–330, 2001.
[28]  A. Archer, “In situ waterjet placement of powdered activated carbon in contaminated sediments,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Remediation of Contaminated Sediments, Batelle, New Orleans, La, USA, 2011.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133