In complex emulsions, viscosity or viscosity-associated sensory attributes such as creaminess are important for quality assessment and product differentiation. Two sets of emulsions with fat or locust bean gum content being varied at seven levels were developed; the two emulsions at each level had similar apparent viscosity. Additionally, sugar concentration was kept constant either with respect to total emulsion, or with respect to the aqueous phase. Series of two-alternative forced choice tests were performed with one constant stimulus, and just noticeable differences were calculated using probability regression. The results show that, when viscosity was not compensated, it was easy for the subjects to (a) distinguish emulsions with different fat content when the fat content was addressed in the question, and to (b) distinguish emulsions with different fat or locust bean gum content when creaminess was addressed. For the latter descriptor, it is of minor importance whether viscosity is altered by fat content or a thickener. Weber fractions that were calculated for viscosity were approximately 0.20. The quantitative effects of viscosity on sweetness, however, depend on how product rheology was modified.
References
[1]
Flett, K.; Duizer, L.M.; Goff, H.D. Perceived creaminess and viscosity of aggregated particles of casein micelles and κ-carrageenan. J. Food Sci. 2010, 75, 5255–5262.
[2]
Kilcast, D.; Clegg, S. Sensory perception of creaminess and its relationship with food structure. Food Qual. Prefer. 2002, 13, 609–623, doi:10.1016/S0950-3293(02)00074-5.
Tournier, C.; Sulmont-Rossé, C.; Sémon, E.; Vignin, A.; Issanchou, S.; Guichard, E. A study on texture-taste-aroma interactions: Physico-chemical and cognitive mechanisms. Int. Dairy J. 2009, 19, 450–458, doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2009.01.003.
[5]
Hollowood, T.A.; Linforth, R.S.T.; Taylor, A.J. The effect of viscosity on the perception of flavour. Chem. Senses 2002, 27, 583–591, doi:10.1093/chemse/27.7.583.
[6]
Vingerhoeds, M.H.; de Wijk, R.A.; Zoet, F.D.; Nixdorf, R.R.; van Aken, G.A. How emulsion composition and structure affect sensory perception of low viscosity model emulsions. Food Hydrocoll. 2008, 22, 631–646, doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2007.02.011.
[7]
De Wijk, R.A.; Prinz, J.F. Fatty versus creamy sensations for custard desserts, white sauces, and mayonnaises. Food Qual. Prefer. 2007, 18, 641–650, doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.09.004.
[8]
Akhtar, M.; Murray, E.; Dickinson, E. Perception of creaminess of model oil-in-water dairy emulsions: Influence of the shear-thinning nature of a viscosity-controlling hydrocolloid. Food Hydrocoll. 2006, 20, 839–847, doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2005.08.006.
[9]
Lawless, H.T.; Heymann, H. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Principles and Practices, 2nd ed. ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2010; pp. 125–148.
[10]
Marks, L.E. Sensory Processes. The New Psychophysics; Academic Press: New York, NY, USA, 1974; pp. 32–58.
[11]
Hoppert, K.; Zahn, S.; Puschmann, A.; Ullmann, I.; Rohm, H. Quantification of sensory difference thresholds for fat in sweetness in dairy-based emulsions. Food Qual. Prefer. 2012, 26, 52–57, doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.03.008.
[12]
Wendin, K.; Hall, G. Influence of fat, thickener and emulsifier contents on salad dressing: Static and dynamic sensory and rheological analysis. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 2001, 34, 222–233, doi:10.1006/fstl.2001.0757.
[13]
Parrish, F.W.; Talley, F.B.; Phillips, J.G. Sweetness of α-lactose, β-lactose, and equilibrium lactose relative to sucrose. J. Food Sci. 1981, 46, 933–935, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1981.tb15385.x.
[14]
ISO 8586-1:2008. Sensory Analysis—General Guidance for the Selection, Training and Monitoring of Assessors—Part 1: Selected Assessors; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2008.
[15]
ISO 8587:2006. Sensory Analysis—Methodology—Ranking; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
[16]
Rohm, H.; Raaber, S. Difference thresholds in texture evaluation of edible fats: Firmness and spreadability. J. Food Sci. 1992, 57, 647–650, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1992.tb08061.x.
[17]
Shama, F.; Sherman, P. Identification of stimuli controlling the sensory evaluation of viscosity. J. Texture Stud. 1973, 4, 111–118, doi:10.1111/j.1745-4603.1973.tb00657.x.
[18]
Launay, B.; Cuvelier, G.; Martinez-Reyes, S. Viscosity of locust been gum, guar and xanthan gum solutions in the Newtonian domain: A critical examination of the log (ηsp)0–log C[η]0 master curves. Carbohydr. Polym. 1997, 34, 385–395, doi:10.1016/S0144-8617(97)00104-5.
[19]
Richardson, P.H.; Wilmer, J.; Foster, T.J. Dilute solution properties of guar and locust bean gum in sucrose solutions. Food Hydrocoll. 1998, 12, 339–348, doi:10.1016/S0268-005X(98)00025-3.
[20]
Tadros, T. Application of rheology for assessment and prediction of the long-term physical stability of emulsions. In Adv. Colloid Interface Sci.; 2004; Volume 108–109, pp. 227–258.
[21]
R？ssler, E.B.; Pangborn, R.M.; Sidel, J.L.; Stone, H. Expanded statistical tables for estimating significance in paired-comparison, paired-difference, duo-trio and triangle tests. J. Food Sci. 1973, 43, 940–943.
[22]
Kutter, A.; Hanesch, C.; Rauh, C.; Delgado, A. Impact of propriception and tactile sensations in the mouth on the perceived thickness of semi-solid foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 2011, 22, 193–197, doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.09.006.
[23]
Jones, L.; Hunter, I.; Lafontaine, S. Viscosity discrimination: A comparison of an adaptive two-alternate forced-choice and an adjustment procedure. Perception 1997, 26, 1571–1578.
[24]
Kokini, J.L.; Cussler, E.L. Predicting the texture of liquid and melting semi-solid foods. J. Food Sci. 1983, 48, 1221–1225, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.1983.tb09196.x.
[25]
De Wijk, R.A.; Dijksterhuis, G.; Vereijken, P.; Prinz, J.F.; Weenen, H. PROP sensitivity reflects sensory discrimination between custard desserts. Food Qual. Prefer. 2007, 18, 597–604, doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.01.016.
[26]
Ares, G.; Budelli, E.; Brozzone, F.; Gimenez, A.; Lema, P. Consumers’ texture perception of milk desserts. I—Relationship with rheological measurements. J. Texture Stud. 2012, 43, 203–213, doi:10.1111/j.1745-4603.2011.00330.x.
[27]
Saint-Eve, A.; Paci-Kora, E.; Martin, N. Impact of the olfactory quality and chemical complexity of the flavouring agent on the texture of low fat stirred yoghurt assessed by three different sensory methodologies. Food Qual. Prefer. 2004, 15, 655–668, doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2003.09.002.
[28]
Pangborn, R.M.; Gibbs, Z.M.; Tassan, C. Effects of hydrocolloids on apparent viscosity and sensory propeties of selected beverages. J. Texture Stud. 1978, 9, 415–436, doi:10.1111/j.1745-4603.1978.tb01216.x.
[29]
Guinard, J.-X.; Zourmas-Morse, C.; Walchak, C. Relation between parotid saliva flow and composition and the perception of gustatory and trigeminal stimuli in foods. Physiol. Behav. 1998, 63, 109–118.
[30]
Hollowood, T.; Bayarri, S.; Marciani, L.; Busch, J.; Francis, S.; Spiller, R.; Taylor, A.; Hort, J. Modelling sweetness and texture perception in model emulsion systems. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2008, 227, 537–545, doi:10.1007/s00217-007-0752-3.
[31]
Knoop, J.-E.; Sala, G.; Smit, G.; Stieger, M. Combinatory effects of texture and aroma modification on taste perception of model gels. Chemosens. Percep. 2013, 6, 60–69, doi:10.1007/s12078-013-9141-4.
