Spatial Distribution and Dispersal Patterns of Central North American Freshwater Crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) with Emphasis on Implications of Glacial Refugia
Spatial distributions of crayfish were evaluated in relation to glacial geography and possible modes of dispersal from refugia. Species dispersal patterns were a priori hypothesized and tested using principle components analysis (PCA). PCA factor loading plots were evaluated for hypothesized crayfish dispersal patterns. Cambarus laevis was limited to the unglaciated region, while Orconectes immunis, Orconectes virilis, and Procambarus gracilis may have dispersed from western glacial refugia in the upper Missouri drainage. Fallicambarus fodiens and Procambarus acutus dispersed from south of the glacial advance within the Mississippi embayment. Previous dispersal hypotheses for Orconectes propinquus recognized that northern refugia may have been from the Driftless Area in Wisconsin and Illinois and may have invaded more than one refuge since this species was common in unglaciated areas of southwestern Indiana. Orconectes indianensis center of abundance is in the unglaciated region. Disjunct populations likely dispersed into temporary glacial lakes that, when receded, left populations in previously glaciated areas. Cambarus polychromatus possibly dispersed from southern refugia, while Cambarus sp. A cf. diogenes dispersed from southern refugia not sympatric with C. polychromatus. The glacial refugia included western and southern areas of the glacial maximum; however, northern dispersal routes may be important with global climate change. 1. Introduction Changes in climate patterns during the Pleistocene (2.5 million: 11.7 thousand years ago), which brought on the advance of glacial ice through temperate environments, had substantial effects on species distributions [1, 2]. In glaciated areas, topographic diversity was reduced, drainage courses altered, and habitat changed greatly through deposits of large amounts of glacial till [1, 3]. These vicariant events of ice advance caused species to shift ranges south or to other areas of glacial refugia [2]. As ice sheets receded, many species that had been pushed from areas covered by ice, invaded or reinvaded, and many modern species distributions in glaciated regions reflect species dispersal after glacial events [1–6]. In central United States, areas of glacial refugia existed mainly south of the glacial maximum [1]. However, glacial refugia also existed in several isolated locations such as an area north of the glacial maximum known as the Driftless Area in southern Wisconsin and northwestern Illinois, in addition to portions of the upper Missouri river drainage and to the west [1, 3, 5]. Several authors [1,
References
[1]
B. M. Burr and M. L. Page, “Zoogeography of fishes of the Lower Ohio-Upper Mississippi Basin,” in Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes, C. H. Hocutt and E. O. Wiley, Eds., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 1986.
[2]
G. Hewitt, “The genetic legacy of the quaternary ice ages,” Nature, vol. 405, no. 6789, pp. 907–913, 2000.
[3]
L. M. Page, “The crayfishes and shrimps (Decapoda) of Illinois,” Illinois Natural History Survey Bulletin, vol. 33, pp. 335–448, 1985.
[4]
S. D. Gerking, “Distribution of the fishes of Indiana,” Investigations of Indiana Lakes and Streams, vol. 3, pp. 1–137, 1945.
[5]
H. H. Hobbs III and J. P. Jass, The Crayfishes and Shrimp of Wisconsin (Cambaridae, Paleomonidae), Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, Wis, USA, 1988.
[6]
R. Rhodes, “The evolution of the crayfishes of the genus Orconectes section limosus,” The Ohio Journal of Science, vol. 62, pp. 65–96, 1962.
[7]
J. P. Hayes and R. G. Harrison, “Variation in mitochondrial DNA and the biogeographic history of woodrats (Neotoma) of the Eastern United States,” Systematic Biology, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 331–344, 1992.
[8]
J. Meril?, M. Bj?rklund, and A. J. Baker, “Historical demography and present day population structure of the greenfinch, Carduelis chloris—an analysis of mtDNA control-region sequences,” Evolution, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 946–956, 1997.
[9]
R. F. Thoma and F. R. Jezerinac, “New distribution records of crayfish (Cambarus and Fallicambarus) from Ohio, including a new subspecies record,” Ohio Journal of Science, vol. 82, pp. 136–138, 1982.
[10]
R. F. Thoma and R. F. Jezerinac, Ohio Crayfish and Shrimp Atlas, Ohio Biological Survey Miscellaneous Contribution No. 7, 2000.
[11]
K. R. Zamudio and W. K. Savage, “Historical isolation, range expansion, and secondary contact of two highly divergent mitochondrial lineages in spotted salamanders (Ambystoma maculatum),” Evolution, vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1631–1652, 2003.
[12]
K. C. Rowe, E. J. Heske, P. W. Brown, and K. N. Paige, “Surviving the ice: northern refugia and postglacial colonization,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 28, pp. 10355–10359, 2004.
[13]
R. M. Strange and B. M. Burr, “Intraspecific phylogeography of North American highland fishes: a test of the Pleistocene vicariance hypothesis,” Evolution, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 885–897, 1997.
[14]
J. M. Omernik and A. L. Gallant, “Ecoregions of the Midwestern United States,” Tech. Rep. EPA 600/3-88/037, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Ore, USA, 1988.
[15]
J. L. Hough, Geology of the Great Lakes, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill, USA, 1958.
[16]
A. F. Schneider, “Physiography,” in Natural Features of Indiana, A. A. Lindsey, Ed., pp. 40–56, Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis, Ind, USA, 1966.
[17]
T. P. Simon, “Standard operating procedures for the collection and study of burrowing crayfish in Indiana. I. Methods for collection of burrowing crayfish in streams and terrestrial habitats,” Miscellaneous Papers of the Indiana Biological Survey Aquatic Research Center 2, 2004.
[18]
T. P. Simon, “Checklist of the crayfish and freshwater shrimp (Decapoda) of Indiana,” Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, vol. 110, pp. 104–110, 2001.
[19]
W. L. Pflieger, The Crayfishes of Missouri, Conservation Commission of the State of Missouri, Jeffersonville, Mo, USA, 1996.
[20]
R. F. Thoma, R. F. Jezerinac, and T. P. Simon, “Cambarus (Tubericambarus) polychromatus (Decapoda: Cambaridae), a new species of crayfish from the United States,” Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 326–336, 2005.
[21]
J. L. Burskey and T. P. Simon, “Distribution of crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) in West-Central Indiana, with notes on reproductive biology,” Miscellaneous Papers of the Indiana Biological Survey Aquatic Research Center, vol. 6, pp. 1–18, 2007.
[22]
R. V. Bovbjerg, “Ecological isolation and competitive exclusion in two crayfish (Orconectes virilis and Orconectes immunis),” Ecology, vol. 51, pp. 225–236, 1970.
[23]
T. P. Simon, M. Weiseit, E. Seabrook et al., “Notes on Indiana crayfish (Decapoda: Cambaridae) with comments on distribution, taxonomy, life history, and habitat,” Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, vol. 114, pp. 55–61, 2005.
[24]
T. P. Simon and R. F. Thoma, “Distribution patterns of freshwater crayfish (Decopoda: Cambaridae) in the Patoka River basin of Indiana,” Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science, vol. 112, pp. 175–185, 2003.