Ye Lieping, Ma Qianli, Miao Zhiwei. Study on earthquake intensities for seismic analysis of structures [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2009, 29(4): 9―22. (in Chinese)
Han Jianping, Zhou Wei, Li Hui. Correlation between ground motion intensity indices and SDOF system responses with medium-to-long period based on the Wenchuan earthquake data [J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2011, 28(10): 185―196. (in Chinese)
[4]
Baker J W, Cornell C A. Spectral shape, epsilon and record selection [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2006, 35 (9): 1077―1095.
[5]
Baker J W, Cornell C A. Vector-valued intensity measures incorporating spectral shape for prediction of structural response [J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 2008, 12(4): 534―554.
[6]
Shome N, Cornell C A. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures [R]. Stanford: Report No. RMS-35, RMS Program, Stanford University, 1999.
[7]
Haselton C B, Baker J W, Goulet C G, et al. The importance of considering spectral shape when evaluating building seismic performance under extreme ground motions [C]// Kona: Proceedings of 2008 Structural Engineers Association of California Convention. Kona, 2008: 10.
[8]
Cornell C A, Krawinkler H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment [R]. Berkeley, CA: PEER Center News, 2000, 3(2): 1―3.
[9]
Deierlein G G. Overview of a comprehensive framework for earthquake performance assessment [C]// Bled, Slovenia: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Performance-Based Seismic Design-Concepts and Implementation, 2004: 15―26.
[10]
Moehle J P, Deierlein G G. A framework methodology for performance-based earthquake engineering [C]// Vancouver, Canada: Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2004: 679.
Wang Yayong, Liu Xiaodi, Cheng Minxian. Study on the input of earthquake ground motion for time history analysis of structures [J]. Journal of Building Structures, 1991, 12(2): 51―60. (in Chinese)
[13]
Luco N. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis, SMRF connection fractures, and near-source effects [D]. Stanford: Stanford University, 2001.
[14]
Katsanos E I, Sextos A G, Manolis G D. Selection of earthquake ground motion records: A state-of-the-art review from a structural engineering perspective [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2010, 30(4): 157―169.
Han Jianping, Lü Xilin, Li Hui. State-of-the-art of performance-based earthquake engineering and need for structural nonlinear analysis [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2007, 27(4): 15―23. (in Chinese)
[18]
Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C A. Incremental dynamic analysis [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2002, 31(3): 491―514.
[19]
Seismosoft. SeismoStruct V6.5-A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures [CP]. Pavia, Italy. http://www.seismosoft.com, 2013-07-19.
[20]
Cordova P P, Deierlein G G, Mehanny S S, et al. Development of a two-parameter seismic intensity measure and probabilistic assessment procedure [C]// Sapporo, Hokkaido: Proceedings of the 2nd U.S.-Japan Workshop on Performance-based Earthquake Engineering Methodology for Reinforced Concrete Building Structures, 2000: 187―206.
[21]
Inoue T. Seismic hazard analysis of multi-degree- of-freedom structures [R]. Report No. RMS-8. Stanford, CA: Stanford University, 1990.
[22]
Mehanny S S, Deierlein G G. Modeling and assessment of seismic performance of composite frames with reinforced concrete columns and steel beams [R]. Stanford: The John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford University, 2000.
[23]
Vamvatsikos D, Cornell C A. Developing efficient scalar and vector intensity measures for IDA capacity estimation by incorporating elastic spectral shape information [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2005, 34(3): 1573―1600.
[24]
Bojórquez E, Iervolino I. Spectral shape proxies and nonlinear structural response [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(7): 996―1008.
[25]
Bojórquez E, Iervolino I. A spectral shape-based scalar ground motion intensity measure for maximum and cumulative structural demands [C]// Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia: Proceedings of 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2010: 158―165.
[26]
Baker J W, Cornell C A. Choice of a vector of ground motion intensity measures for seismic demand hazard analysis [C]// Vancouver, Canada: Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 2004: 3384.
[27]
Baker J W. Vector-valued ground motion intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand analysis [D]. Stanford: Stanford University, 2005.
[28]
Mousavi M, Ghafory-Ashtiany M, Azarbakht A. A new indicator of elastic spectral shape for the reliable selection of ground motion records [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 2011, 40(12): 1403―1416.
[29]
Baker J W. Conditional mean spectrum: Tool for ground motion selection [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 2011, 137(3): 322―331.
[30]
Kramer S L. Geotechnical earthquake engineering [M]. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 1996.
[31]
Bazzurro P, Cornell C A. On disaggregation of seismic hazard [J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1999, 89(2): 501―520.
[32]
McGuire R K. Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop [J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 1995, 85(5): 1257―1284.
[33]
Wang Gang. A ground motion selection and modification method capturing response spectrum characteristics and variability of scenario earthquakes [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2011, 31(4): 611―625.
[34]
David M Boore, Gail M Atkinson. Ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s [J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2008, 24(1): 99―138.
[35]
Mousavi M, Shahri M, Azarbakht A. E-CMS: A new design spectrum for nuclear structures in high levels of seismic hazard [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2012, 252: 27―33.
[36]
Iervolino I, Giorgio M, Galasso C, et al. Conditional hazard maps for secondary intensity measures [J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2010, 100(6): 3312―3319.
[37]
Cosenza E, Manfredi G. Damage indices and damage measures [J]. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 2000, 2(1): 50―59.
[38]
Chioccarelli E, Esposito S, Iervolino I. Implementing conditional hazard for earthquake engineering practice: the Italian example [C]// Lisboa, PT: Proceedings of 15WCEE, 2012: 2883.
