全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

儿童胃肠型流感与轮状病毒性肠炎的临床特征比较
Comparison of Clinical Features between Gastrointestinal Influenza and Rotavirus Enteritis in Children

DOI: 10.12677/ACRP.2019.73003, PP. 15-20

Keywords: 儿童,胃肠型流感,轮状病毒性肠炎,临床特征
Children
, Gastrointestinal Influenza, Rotavirus Enteritis, Clinical Features

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

目的:比较儿童胃肠型流感及有发热症状的轮状病毒性肠炎临床特征,以提高临床诊断水平。方法:回顾性分析2017年12月至2018年1月胃肠型流感及轮状病毒性肠炎患儿的临床资料。结果:1) 胃肠型流感102例,轮状病毒性肠炎268例,胃肠型流感组发病年龄均数为3.9 ± 2.3岁,轮状病毒性肠炎组发病年龄均数为1.9 ± 1.8岁,组间差异存在统计学意义(t = 8.2, P < 0.01),两组间性别构成比差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05);2) 全部病例均有发热,以热峰超过39℃界定为高热,胃肠型流感高热发生率为88.2% (90/102),轮状病毒性肠炎组74.6% (200/268),组间差异存在统计学意义(X2 = 8.1, P < 0.01);胃肠型流感组热峰为39.2 ± 0.7℃,轮状病毒性肠炎组38.8 ± 0.6℃,组间差异存在统计学意义(t = 6.1, P < 0.01);3) 全部病例均有不同程度腹泻和(或)呕吐,每日腹泻最多次数轮状病毒性肠炎组为5.4 ± 2.9次,高于胃肠型流感组1.3 ± 1.9次,组间差异存在统计学意义(t = ?16.0, P < 0.01);每日呕吐最多次数轮状病毒性肠炎组为2.7 ± 2.7次,高于胃肠型流感组1.8 ± 1.8次/天,组间差异存在统计学意义(t = ?4.1, P < 0.01);4) 以Vesikari临床严重度评分系统评判严重程度,胃肠型流感组5.9 ± 1.6分,轮状病毒性肠炎组8.3 ± 2.4分,组间差异存在统计学意义(t = 11.2, P < 0.01),两组轻中重度例数占比比较差异存在统计学差异(X2 = 86.2, P < 0.01)。结论:胃肠型流感与轮状病毒性肠炎在发病季节上有交叉,临床特征类似,但发热热峰、腹泻及呕吐频次、疾病严重程度有所不同,快速病原学检测有助于鉴别诊断。
Objective: To compare the clinical features of gastrointestinal influenza and rotavirus enteritis with fever in children. Methods: Clinical data of children with gastrointestinal influenza and rotavirus enteritis from December 2017 to January 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: 1) There were 102 cases of gastrointestinal influenza and 268 cases of rotavirus enteritis. The mean age of onset of gastrointestinal influenza was 3.9 ± 2.3 years, and the group of rotavirus enteritis was 1.9 ± 1.8 years. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t = 8.2, P < 0.01). There was no statistically significant difference in gender composition between the two groups (P > 0.05). 2) All patients had a fever. It is defined as high heat when the thermal peak exceeds 39℃. The high fever incidence of gastrointestinal influenza was 88.2% (90/102), and the group of rotavirus enteritis was 74.6% (200/268). The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (X2 = 8.1, P < 0.01). The heat peak of gastrointestinal influenza group was 39.2 ± 0.7℃, while that of rotavirus enteritis group was 38.8 ± 0.6℃. There was significant difference between the two groups (t = 6.1, P < 0.01). 3) All the patients had diarrhea and vomiting of varying degrees. The maximum number of diarrhea per day in the group of rotavirus enteritis was (5.4 ± 2.9) times, which was higher than that in gastrointestinal influenza group (1.3 ± 1.9) times, there was statistical significance between the two groups (t = ?16.0, P < 0.01). The maximum number of vomiting per day in rotavirus enteritis group was (2.7 ± 2.7) times, which was higher than that in gastrointestinal

References

[1]  国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 流行性感冒诊疗方案(2018年版) [J]. 中国感染控制杂志, 18(2): 181-184.
[2]  黎毅敏, 杨子峰. 流行性感冒诊断与治疗指南(2011年版)解读[J]. 中国实用内科杂志, 2012, 32(2): 105-108.
[3]  Alfredo Guarino, Shai Ashkenazi, Dominique Gendrel, 等. (2015) 欧洲儿童急性胃肠炎处理循证指南(2014年版)[J]. 中华儿科杂志, 53(7): 499-509.
[4]  中华医学会儿科学分会呼吸学组, “中华实用儿科临床杂志”编辑委员会. 儿童流感诊断与治疗专家共识(2015年版)[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2015, 30(17): 1296-1303.
[5]  Lewis, K.D.C., Dallas, M.J., Victor, J.C., et al. (2012) Comparison of Two Clinical Severity Scoring Systems in Two Multi-Center, Developing Country Rotavirus Vaccine Trials in Africa and Asia. Vaccine, 30, A159-A166.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.126
[6]  江载芳, 申昆玲. 诸福堂实用儿科学: 上册[M]. 第8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 287.
[7]  李云娟, 王雷, 王阳, 等. 978例儿童流感临床分析[J]. 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志, 2017, 31(3): 202-207.
[8]  吕会礼, 彭华保, 何志刚, 等. 某院婴幼儿A组轮状病毒性肠炎流行病学分析[J]. 现代医药卫生, 2017, 33(2): 253-254.
[9]  孟广萍. 小儿轮状病毒肠炎的综合治疗方案[J]. 中国医药指南, 2017, 15(15): 38-39.
[10]  王芳, 孙宇, 朱汝南, 等. 流感病毒快速检测方法在儿童流感样病例病原诊断中的应用[J]. 中国循证儿科杂志, 2012, 7(4): 289-292.
[11]  罗明, 龚成, 史玲莉, 等. 五种常用轮状病毒检测方法的评价及应用策略[J]. 疾病监测, 2014, 29(3): 223-227.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133