超声诊断的应用与研究
Application and Research of Ultrasound Diagnosis

DOI: 10.12677/ACRVM.2019.72004, PP. 23-28

Keywords: 超声，诊断，临床
Ultrasound, Diagnosis, Clinical

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

现代的医学影像技术主要有四种，分别是X光、磁共振、核医学成像、医学超声成像。其中，医学超声成像出现最早。与其它成像技术相比，超声有安全、适应面广、直观、可重复检查、对软组织鉴别力强、灵活、价廉等优点。由于超声的这些优点，直到现在，超声成像仍然广泛应用于医疗诊断中。超声设备是普及率最高，应用最广泛的常规影像诊断仪器，其在初诊筛查和转诊分流中起着重要作用。与之相对应，功能齐全，使用方便的超声诊断系统也成为医院的必需系统。而目前国内一些医疗机构，特别是基层医院使用的超声诊断系统多为设备配置的单机版，不仅无法实现医院之间和本院内各个科室之间的影像检查信息共享，无法将检查信息有效传达给需转诊的其他科室和医院，而且无法及时地将检查结果反馈给患者，导致信息孤岛问题。另一方面，目前能够实现三维重建功能的彩超设备多为进口设备，价格昂贵且三维重建的过程复杂，需要耗费大量时间。
There are four main types of modern medical imaging technology, namely X-ray, magnetic resonance, nuclear medicine imaging, and medical ultrasound imaging. Among them, medical ultrasound imaging appeared firstly. Compared with other imaging technologies, ultrasound has the advantages of safety, wide adaptability, intuitive, repeatable inspection, strong discrimination against soft tissues, flexibility, and low cost. Due to the advantages of ultrasound, ultrasound imaging is still widely used in medical diagnosis until now. Ultrasound equipment is the most popular and widely used routine diagnostic imaging instrument, which plays an important role in initial screening and referral diversion. Correspondingly, the fully functional and easy-to-use ultrasound diagnostic system has become a necessary system for hospitals. At present, some medical institutions in China, especially in primary hospitals, use ultrasound-based diagnostic systems, which are not only unable to realize the sharing of image inspection information between hospitals and departments within the hospital, and cannot effectively communicate inspection information to other departments and hospitals that need to be referred to, and the results of the examination cannot be reported back to the patient in time, resulting in information island problems. On the other hand, the color-adjusting devices that can realize the three-dimensional reconstruction function are mostly imported devices, which are expensive and the process of three-dimensional reconstruction is complicated, and it takes a lot of time.

References

[1]	O’Brien, W.D., Deng, C.X., Harris, G.R., et al. (2008) The Risk of Exposure to Diagnostic Ultrasound in Postnatal Subjects: Thermal Effects. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 27, 517-535.
[2]	American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine (AIUM) (1992) Standard for Real-Time Display of Thermal and Mechanical Acoustic Output Indices on Diagnostic Ultrasound Equipment. Laurel.
[3]	Abramowicz, J.S., Barnett, S., Duck, F., Edmonds, P., Hynynen, K. and Ziskin, M. (2008) Fetal Thermal Effects of Diagnostic Ultrasound. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 27, 541-559.
[4]	Church, C.C., Carstensen, E.L., Nyborg, W.L., Carson, P.L., Frizzell, L.A. and Bailey, M.R. (2008) The Risk of Exposure to Diagnostic Ultrasound in Postnatal Subjects: Nonthermal Mechanisms. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 27, 565-592.
[5]	Stratmeyer, M., Greenleaf, J., Dalecki, D. and Salvesen, K. (2008) Fetal Ultrasound: Mechanical Effects. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 27, 597-605.
[6]	Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R. and Friedman, J. (2009) The Elements of Statistical Learning. 2nd Edition, Springer, Berlin.
[7]	Graber, M., Wachter, R. and Cassel, C. (2012) Bringing Diagnosis into the Quality and Safety Equations. JAMA, 308, 1211-1212. https://doi.org/10.1001/2012.jama.11913
[8]	Berner, E. and Graber, M. (2008) Overconfidence as a Cause of Diagnostic Error in Medicine. The American Journal of Medicine, 121, S2-S23.
[9]	Sonderegger-Iseli, K., Burger, S., Muntwyler, J., et al. (2000) Diagnostic Errors in Three Medical Eras: A Necropsy Study. The Lancet, 355, 2027-2031. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02349-7
[10]	Diamandis, E.P. (2004) Analysis of Serum Proteomic Pat-terns for Early Cancer Diagnosis: Drawing Attention to Potential Problems. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 96, 353-356. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh056
[11]	Blendon, R.J., DesRoches, C.M., Brodie, M., et al. (2002) Views of Practicing Physicians and the Public on Medical Errors. The New England Journal of Medicine, 347, 1933-1940. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa022151
[12]	Singh, H., Thomas, E., Wilson, L., et al. (2010) Errors of Diagnosis in Pediatric Practice: A Multisite Survey. Pediatrics, 126, 70-79. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2009-3218
[13]	Peabody, J.W., Luck, J., Jain, S., et al. (2004) Assessing the Accu-racy of Administrative Data in Health Information Systems. Medical Care, 42, 1066-1072. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200411000-00005
[14]	Beam, C.A., Layde, P.M. and Sullivan, D.C. (1996) Variability in the Interpretation of Screening Mammograms by US Radiologists. Findings from a National Sample. Archives of Internal Medicine, 156, 209-213. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.1996.00440020119016
[15]	Raab, S.S. (2005) Variability of Practice in Anatomic Pathology and Its Effect on Patient Outcomes. Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology, 22, 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semdp.2006.01.004
[16]	Gandhi, T.K., Kachalia, A., Thomas, E.J., et al. (2006) Missed and Delayed Diagnoses in the Ambulatory Setting: A Study of Closed Malpractice Claims. Archives of Internal Medicine, 145, 488-496. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-145-7-200610030-00006
[17]	Charlton, I., Jones, K. and Bain, J. (1991) Delay in Diagnosis of Childhood Asthma and Its Influence on Respiratory Consultation Rates. Archives of Disease in Child-hood, 66, 633-635. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.66.5.633
[18]	Tsang, C., Majeed, A. and Avlin, P. (2012) Routinely Recorded Patient Safety Events in Primary Care: A Literature Review. Family Practice, 29, 8-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmr050
[19]	Levinson, D. (2012) Adverse Events in Hospitals: National Incidence among Medicare Beneficiaries. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General.
[20]	Classen, D., Resar, R., Griffin, F., et al. (2011) Global Trigger Tool Shows That Adverse Events in Hospitals May Be Ten Times Greater than Previously Measured. Health Affairs, 30, 581-589. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0190
[21]	Singh, H., Thomas, E.J., Khan, M.M., et al. (2007) Identifying Diagnostic Errors in Primary Care Using an Electronic Screening Algorithm. Archives of Internal Medicine, 167, 302-308. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.167.3.302

Full-Text