Geometric Total Plaque Area Is an Equally Powerful Phenotype Compared With Carotid Intima

Currently, carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) and geometric total plaque area (gTPA) are computed manually and thus are tedious and prone to interobserver and intraobserver variabilities. This study presents an intelligence-based automated deep learning (DL)–based technique for carotid wall interface detection, cIMT, and lumen diameter (LD) measurements, followed by a 3D cylindrical approach for TPA measurement. The observers were used for manual tracings of which were then used for the design of two DL-based systems. The DL boundaries for inner lumen wall and outer interadventitial borders were used for computing the cIMT and LD. Using cylindrical approach, we computed the gTPA. Furthermore, we compute the 10-year image-based cIMT and gTPA, using the progression rates. A total of 396 B-mode ultrasound right and left common carotid artery images were taken from 203 patients. The mean cIMT and gTPA using DL1 and DL2 is 0.91 mm, 20.52 mm2 and 0.88 mm, 19.44 mm2, respectively. The coefficient of correlation between gTPA and cIMT using DL1 and DL2 is 0.92 (P < .001) and 0.94 (P < .001), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) for gTPA showed an improvement over cIMT by 14.36% and 12.57% for DL1 and DL2, respectively. The corresponding 10-year risk improvements were 9.09% and 6.26%. Our statistical significance tests successfully passed t test, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon, Kolmogorov-Smirnov, and Friedman. The study shows gTPA as an equally powerful carotid risk biomarker like cIMT. Given the cIMT and LD, cylindrical fitting is a fast method for gTPA measurements