全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Application of LiDAR Data for Deep Learning Based Near Crash Prediction at Signalized Intersection

DOI: 10.4236/jtts.2023.132008, PP. 158-172

Keywords: Near Crash Prediction, Machine Learning, Kinematics, Convolutional Gated Recurrent Neural Network, Recall

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Near crash events are often regarded as an excellent surrogate measure for traffic safety research because they include abrupt changes in vehicle kinematics that can lead to deadly accident scenarios. In this paper, we introduced machine learning and deep learning algorithms for predicting near crash events using LiDAR data at a signalized intersection. To predict a near crash occurrence, we used essential vehicle kinematic variables such as lateral and longitudinal velocity, yaw, tracking status of LiDAR, etc. A deep learning hybrid model Convolutional Gated Recurrent Neural Network (CNN + GRU) was introduced, and comparative performances were evaluated with multiple machine learning classification models such as Logistic Regression, K Nearest Neighbor, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Adaptive Boost, and deep learning models like Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). As vehicle kinematics changes occur after sudden brake, we considered average deceleration and kinematic energy drop as thresholds to identify near crashes after vehicle braking time . We looked at the next 3 seconds of this braking time as our prediction horizon. All models work best in the next 1-second prediction horizon to braking time. The results also reveal that our hybrid model gathers the greatest near crash information while working flawlessly. In comparison to existing models for near crash prediction, our hybrid Convolutional Gated Recurrent Neural Network model has 100% recall, 100% precision, and 100% F1-score: accurately capturing all near crashes. This prediction performance outperforms previous baseline models in forecasting near crash events and provides opportunities for improving traffic safety via Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS).

References

[1]  WHO (2022) Road Traffic Injuries.
https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/road-traffic-injuries
[2]  NHTSA (2022) Newly Released Estimates Show Traffic Fatalities Reached a 16-Year High in 2021, in NHTSA Media.
[3]  Palit, J.R. (2022) Application of Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for Traffic Operation and Safety Assessment at Signalized Intersections. Masters Theses and Doctoral Dissertations, University of Tennessee at Chattanooga.
https://scholar.utc.edu/theses/779
[4]  Guo, F., et al. (2010) Evaluating the Relationship between Near-Crashes and Crashes: Can Near-Crashes Serve as a Surrogate Safety Metric for Crashes? Washington DC.
[5]  Chen, H., Cao, L. and Logan, D.B. (2012) Analysis of Risk Factors Affecting the Severity of Intersection Crashes by Logistic Regression. Traffic Injury Prevention, 13, 300-307.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2011.653841
[6]  Rezapour, M. and Ksaibati, K. (2018) Application of Multinomial and Ordinal Logistic Regression to Model Injury Severity of Truck Crashes, Using Violation and Crash Data. Journal of Modern Transportation, 26, 268-277.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40534-018-0166-x
[7]  Montella, A., et al. (2012) Analysis of Powered Two-Wheeler Crashes in Italy by Classification Trees and Rules Discovery. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 49, 58-72.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.04.025
[8]  Wang, J., et al. (2015) Driving Risk Assessment Using Near-Crash Database through Data Mining of Tree-Based Model. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 84, 54-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2015.07.007
[9]  Wang, Y., et al. (2017) Machine Learning Methods for Driving Risk Prediction. Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Emergency Management Using, Redondo Beach, 7 November 2017, Article No. 10.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3152465.3152476
[10]  Li, P., Abdel-Aty, M. and Yuan, J. (2020) Real-Time Crash Risk Prediction on Arterials Based on LSTM-CNN. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 135, Article ID: 105371.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105371
[11]  Yu, R., et al. (2020) Convolutional Neural Networks with Refined Loss Functions for the Real-Time Crash Risk Analysis. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 119, Article ID: 102740.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102740
[12]  Guo, F., et al. (2010) Near Crashes as Crash Surrogate for Naturalistic Driving Studies. Transportation Research Record, 2147, 66-74.
https://doi.org/10.3141/2147-09
[13]  Osman, O.A., et al. (2019) Prediction of Near-Crashes from Observed Vehicle Kinematics Using Machine Learning. Transportation Research Record, 2673, 463-473.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119862629
[14]  Dingus, T.A., et al. (2006) The 100-Car Naturalistic Driving Study, Phase II-Results of the 100-Car Field Experiment. United States Department of Transportation. National Highway Traffic Safety.
[15]  Jonasson, J.K. and Rootzén, H. (2014) Internal Validation of Near-Crashes in Naturalistic Driving Studies: A Continuous and Multivariate Approach. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 62, 102-109.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.013
[16]  Jovanis, P.P., et al. (2011) Analysis of Naturalistic Driving Event Data: Omitted-Variable Bias and Multilevel Modeling Approaches. Transportation Research Record, 2236, 49-57.
https://doi.org/10.3141/2236-06
[17]  Seacrist, T., et al. (2020) Near Crash Characteristics among Risky Drivers Using the SHRP2 Naturalistic Driving Study. Journal of Safety Research, 73, 263-269.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2020.03.012
[18]  Perez, M.A., et al. (2017) Performance of Basic Kinematic Thresholds in the Identification of Crash and Near-Crash Events within Naturalistic Driving Data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 103, 10-19.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.005
[19]  Naji, H.A., et al. (2022) Risk Levels Classification of Near-Crashes in Naturalistic Driving Data. Sustainability, 14, 6032.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106032
[20]  Wu, J., et al. (2018) A Novel Method of Vehicle-Pedestrian Near-Crash Identification with Roadside LiDAR Data. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 121, 238-249.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.001
[21]  Palit, J.R., Osman, O.A. and Rakha, H. (2023) Travel Patterns and Street Networks: A Novel Visualization Methodology of City-Level Traffic Flows and Network Usability. Journal of Transportation Technologies, 13, 115-137.
https://doi.org/10.4236/jtts.2023.131006
[22]  Lv, B., et al. (2019) Automatic Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflict Identification with Trajectories of Road Users Extracted from Roadside LiDAR Sensors Using a Rule-Based Method. IEEE Access, 7, 161594-161606.
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2951763
[23]  Smith, D.L., Najm, W.G. and Glassco, R.A. (2002) Feasibility of Driver Judgment as Basis for a Crash Avoidance Database. Transportation Research Record, 1784, 9-16.
https://doi.org/10.3141/1784-02

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133