Error correction has long been suggested to extend the sensitivity of quantum sensors into the Heisenberg Limit. However, operations on logical qubits are only performed through universal gate sets consisting of finite-sized gates such as Clifford + T. Although these logical gate sets allow for universal quantum computation, the finite gate sizes present a problem for quantum sensing, since in sensing protocols, such as the Ramsey measurement protocol, the signal must act continuously. The difficulty in constructing a continuous logical op-erator comes from the Eastin-Knill theorem, which prevents a continuous sig-nal from being both fault-tolerant to local errors and transverse. Since error correction is needed to approach the Heisenberg Limit in a noisy environment, it is important to explore how to construct fault-tolerant continuous operators. In this paper, a protocol to design continuous logical z-rotations is proposed and applied to the Steane Code. The fault tolerance of the designed operator is investigated using the Knill-Laflamme conditions. The Knill-Laflamme condi-tions indicate that the diagonal unitary operator constructed cannot be fault tolerant solely due to the possibilities of X errors on the middle qubit. The ap-proach demonstrated throughout this paper may, however, find success in codes with more qubits such as the Shor code, distance 3 surface code, [15, 1, 3] code, or codes with a larger distance such as the [11, 1, 5] code.
References
[1]
Foley, C. (2014) SQUID Use for Geophysics: Finding Billions of Dollars in APS March Meeting Abstracts 2014 (Mar.), F23.004.
[2]
De Luna, F.D., da Silva, A.G. and dos Santos Vianna Junior, A. (2020) The Influence of Geometry on the Fluid Dynamics of Continuous Settler. Open Journal of Fluid Dynamics, 10, 164-183. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojfd.2020.103011
[3]
Zhou, S., et al. (2019) Error-Corrected Quantum Sensing. Optical, Opto-Atomic, and Entanglement-Enhanced Precision Metrology, Vol. 10934, 109341J.
[4]
Kessler, E.M., Lovchinsky, I., Sushkov, A.O. and Lukin, M.D. (2014) Quantum Error Correction for Metrology. Physical Review Letters, 112, Article ID: 150802. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.150802
[5]
Shettell, N., Munro, W.J., Markham, D. and Nemoto, K. (2021) Practical Limits of error Correction for Quantum Metrology. New Journal of Physics, 23, Article ID: 043038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/abf533
[6]
Rojkov, I., Layden, D., Cappellaro, P., Home, J. and Reiter, F. (2022) Bias in Error-Corrected Quantum Sensing. Physical Review Letters, 128, Article ID: 140503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.140503
[7]
Herrera-Marti, D.A., Gefen, T., Aharonov, D., Katz, N. and Retzker, A. (2015) Quantum Error-Correction-Enhanced Magnetometer Overcoming the Limit Imposed by Relaxation. Physical Review Letters, 115, Article ID: 200501. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.200501
[8]
Matsuzaki, Y. and Benjamin, S. (2017) Magnetic-Field Sensing with Quantum Error Detection under the Effect of Energy Relaxation. Physical Review A, 95, Article ID: 032303. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.032303
[9]
Reiter, F., Sorensen, A.S., Zoller, P. and Muschik, C.A. (2017) Dissipative Quantum Error Correction and Application to Quantum Sensing with Trapped Ions. Nature Communications, 8, Article No. 1822. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01895-5
[10]
Eastin, B. and Knill, E. (2009) Restrictions on Transversal Encoded Quantum Gate Sets. Physical Review Letters, 102, Article ID: 110502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.110502
[11]
Viola, L., Lloyd, S. and Knill, E. (1999) Universal Control of Decoupled Quantum Systems. Physical Review Letters, 83, 4888-4891. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.4888
[12]
Bylander, J., et al. (2011) Noise Spectroscopy through Dynamical Decoupling with a Superconducting Flux Qubit. Nature Physics, 7, 565-570. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys1994
[13]
Wang, S. (2022) Does Design Thinking Run Counter to Design? Art and Design Review, 10, 41-46. https://doi.org/10.4236/adr.2022.101004
[14]
Degen, C., Reinhard, F. and Cappellaro, P. (2017) Quantum Sensing. Reviews of Modern Physics, 89, Article ID: 035002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002
[15]
Welch, J., Greenbaum, D., Mostame, S. and Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2014) Efficient Quantum Circuits for Diagonal Unitaries without Ancillas. New Journal of Physics, 16, Article ID: 033040. https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/16/3/033040
[16]
Girvin, S.M. (2023) Introduction to Quantum Error Correction and Fault Tolerance. https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysLectNotes.70
[17]
(1996) Multiple-Particle Interference and Quantum Error Correction. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 452, 2551-2577. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1996.0136
[18]
Fowler, A.G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J.M. and Cleland, A.N. (2012) Surface Codes: Towards Practical Large-Scale Quantum Computation. Physical Review A, 86, Article ID: 032324. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.032324
[19]
Krinner, S., et al. (2022) Realizing Repeated Quantum Error Correction in a Distance-Three Surface Code. Nature, 605, 669-674. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04566-8
[20]
Nielsen, M.A. and Chuang, I.L. (2000) Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.