全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

零售商主导下供应链信息策略及减排激励研究
Research on Supply Chain Information Strategy and Emission Reduction Incentive under Retailer’s Leading

DOI: 10.12677/MSE.2024.131011, PP. 116-130

Keywords: 激励契约,减排信息谎报,需求信息共享
Incentive Contract
, Misrepresentation of Emission Reduction Information, Demand Information Sharing

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

本文基于碳税环境下的二级服装供应链结构,考虑制造商私有减排信息同时零售商私有需求信息,探究制造商的减排信息谎报和零售商的需求信息共享策略及其对供应链减排和利润的影响,并设计零售商主导下提升供应链减排的激励契约。研究表明:当零售商掌握供应链的话语权时,制造商没有谎报减排信息的动机;无论市场状态高低,零售商均愿意共享信息,仅有市场状态高时信息共享有利于供应链减排但和集中决策相比存在效益损失。进而针对市场状态为高时,设计成本分担–收益共享契约,可促进供应链的减排提升同时供应链总体利润增长,且零售商可以通过控制收益共享比例来进行供应链的利润分配。
Based on the structure of the second-level garment supply chain under the carbon tax environment, this paper considers the manufacturer’s private emission reduction information and the retailer’s private demand information, explores the manufacturer’s emission reduction information misreporting and retailer’s demand information sharing strategies and their impact on supply chain emission reduction and profits, and designs incentive contracts to promote supply chain emission reduction under the leadership of retailers. The research shows that when retailers have the right to speak in the supply chain, manufacturers have no incentive to lie about emission reduction information; Retailers are willing to share information no matter the market state is high or low. Only when the market state is high, information sharing is conducive to supply chain emission reduction, but there is benefit loss compared with centralized decision-making. Furthermore, when the market state is high, the design of cost-sharing—revenue sharing contract can promote the emission reduction of the supply chain and the overall profit growth of the supply chain, and retailers can control the proportion of revenue sharing to carry out the profit distribution of the supply chain.

References

[1]  Lee, H.L., Padmanabhan, V. and Whang, S. (1997) Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect. Management Science, 43, 5465-58.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.43.4.546
[2]  Zhang, Q., Chen, J. and Zaccour, G. (2020) Market Targeting and Information Sharing with Social Influences in a Luxury Supply Chain. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 133, Article ID: 101822.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.101822
[3]  胡华清, 王璐, 陈丽华, 等. 制造商差异化供应下的零售商信息策略[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-11.
https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.0557, 2023-11-07.
[4]  王文隆, 姚锐, 张涑贤. 考虑制造商创新的供应链双向需求信息共享研究 [J]. 中国管理科学, 2022, 30(5): 226-235.
[5]  Zhao, D. and Han, H. (2020) Decisions and Coordination in a Capacity Sharing Supply Chain considering Production Cost Misreporting. Complexity, 2020, Article ID: 6637375.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6637375
[6]  Vosooghidizaji, M., Taghipour, A. and Canel-Depitre, B. (2022) Coordinating Corporate Social Responsibility in a Two-Level Supply Chain under Bilateral Information Asymmetry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, Article ID: 132627.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132627
[7]  李小燕, 王道平. 碳交易机制下考虑竞争和信息非对称的供应链协调研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(11): 47-52.
[8]  张艳芬, 徐琪, 孙中苗. 供应商竞争下考虑道德风险的平台供应链最优动态激励契约[J/OL]. 中国管理科学: 1-15.
https://doi.org/10.16381/j.cnki.issn1003-207x.2021.1022, 2023-11-07.
[9]  程粟粟, 张帆. 罚款分担契约下绿色供应链最优减排技术选择研究[J]. 软科学, 2022, 36(10): 131-137.
https://doi.org/10.13956/j.ss.1001-8409.2022.10.18
[10]  刘振, 宋寒, 代应, 等. 碳减排外包下的契约优化与选择研究[J]. 运筹与管理, 2022, 31(6): 25-31.
[11]  Iyer, G., Narasimhan, C. and Niraj, R. (2007) Information and Inventory in Distribution Channels. Management Science, 53, 1551-1561.
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1070.0713
[12]  Li, T. and Zhang, H.T. (2015) Information Sharing in a Supply Chain with a Make-to-Stock Manufacturer. Omega, 50, 115-125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.08.001
[13]  王晓锋, 朱晨, 袁阴. 基于供应链的纺织行业节能减排决策[J]. 纺织学报, 2019, 40(1): 166-174.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133