This article takes stock of how critical political economy authors have discussed
the fiscal matter. It deals with the debate on austerity and its consequences in the context of the crisis of contemporary capitalism.
A critical systematic review of the literature was conducted using 16 Marxist
journals, including some of an interdisciplinary nature. The search strategy was
constructed with the free terms: fiscal matter, capitalist crisis and fictitious
capital, and crossed withtax reform,
fiscal policy, public debt, public bonds, fiscal, taxes and austerity. After the
selection processes, 15 articles were chosen and discussed based on three analysis dimensions: 1) the fiscal matter and its
theoretical debate and case studies; 2) the fiscal matter and contemporary capitalism,
focusing on the themes of financialization,
neoliberalism and crisis; 3) fiscal reforms and class struggle, with emphasis on
reforms in the most violent global South. Based on the results found in this review,
it can be concluded that the transformations
of contemporary capitalism reiterate the leading role of fiscal austerity,
with reduced spending and debt control. These elements engender a new dynamic for social rights, with intensification of
privatization through the capitalist State itself. More than the participation of
private capital, mercantilization reflects the dominance of mercantile logic in
social logic and the inevitable need for fiscal adjustment, which, on the periphery
of capitalism, takes on a permanent character.
References
[1]
Alves, P. K. L., & dos Santos, V. M. (2020). Expropriações contemporaneas: O Apoio Estatal à Saúde Suplementar No Brasil. Argumentum, 12, 253-269.
https://doi.org/10.18315/argumentum.v12i2.29214
[2]
Boffo, M., Saad-Filho, A., & Fine, B. (2019). Neoliberal Capitalism: The Authoritarian Turn. Socialist Register, 55, 312-320.
[3]
Callinicos, A. (2014). Deciphering Capital: Marx’s Capital and Its Destiny. Bookmarks Publications.
[4]
Carchedi, G., & Roberts, M. (2013). The Long Roots of the Present Crisis: Keynesians, Austerians, and Marx’s Law. World Review of Political Economy, 4, 86-115.
https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.4.1.0086
[5]
Carnut, L., Cristiano, G. R., Guerra, L. D. S., & Mendes, A. (2022). Caminhos para uma revisão sistemática crítica na literatura marxista: A relação ‘marxismo cultural’ e educação superior. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 12, e604.
https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.12.2022.e604
[6]
Chesnais, F. (2011). Repúdio às dúvidas públicas europeias. Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Economia Política (RSEP), 28, 145-161.
[7]
Chesnais, F. (2019). La théorie du capital de placement financier et les points du système financier mondial où se prépare la crise à venir.
http://alencontre.org/economie/la-theorie-du-capital-de-placement-financier-et-les- points-du-systeme-financier-mondial-ou-se-prepare-la-crise-a-venir.html
[8]
Druck, M. G. F., & Filgueiras, L. A. M. (2007). Política social focalizada e ajuste fiscal: As duas faces do governo Lula. Revista Katálysis, 10, 24-34.
https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-49802007000100004
[9]
Féliz, M. (2009). ¿No hay alternativa frente al ajuste? Crisis, competitividad y opciones populares en Argentina. Herramienta, revista de debate y crítica marxista, 42, 147-160.
[10]
Ferguson, I. (2013). Austeridade no Reino Unido: O fim do estado de bem estar social? Revista Argumentum, 5, 65-88. https://doi.org/10.18315/argumentum.v5i2.5985
[11]
Fleury, S., & Pinho, C. (2018). Liquefação da rede de proteção social no Brasil autoritário. Revista Katálysis, 21, 14-42. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02592018v21n1p14
[12]
Freitas, A. A. (2017). Neoliberalism, Profitability, and the Crisis in the Eurozone. Review of Radical Political Economics, 49, 410-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613417703955
[13]
Herrera, R., & Andreani, T. (2015). Piketty: Regular O Capitalismo através Da Fiscalidade? Argumentum, 7, 138-151. https://doi.org/10.18315/argumentum.v7i1.9716
[14]
Hudson, M. (2019). “Creating Wealth” through Debt: The West’s Finance-Capitalist Road. World Review of Political Economy, 10, 171-190.
https://doi.org/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.10.2.0171
[15]
Itoh, M. (2012). From the Subprime to the Sovereign Crisis: Why Keynesianism Does Not Work. World Review of Political Economy, 3, 4-14.
[16]
Junior, J. A. L., & Mendes, A. N. (2017). Imposto sobre as transações financeiras como uma contribuição ao subfinanciamento do SUS. Revista Argumentum, 9, 164-179.
https://doi.org/10.18315/argum..v9i1.14383
[17]
Khalil, H., & Dill, B. (2018). Negotiating Statist Neoliberalism: The Political Economy of Post-Revolution Egypt. Review of African Political Economy, 45, 574-591.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2018.1547187
[18]
Lima, K. R. S. (2019). Educação superior em tempos de ajustes. Revista Katálysis, 22, 513-524.
[19]
Marx, K. (2017). O Capital. crítica da economia política: livro III: O processo global da produção capitalista. Boitempo.
[20]
Mattei, C. (2022). The Capital Order: How Economists Invented Austerity and Paved the Way to Fascism. The University Press.
https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226818405.001.0001
[21]
Mendes, A. (2022). Crise do capital e o Estado: o desmonte da Saúde Pública brasileira em curso no neofascismo de Bolsonaro. In: A. Mendes, & L. Carnut (Eds.), Economia Política da Saúde: Uma crítica marxista contemporanea (pp. 96-153). Hucitec.
[22]
Ribeiro, I. R., & Salvador, E. S. (2018). Hegemonia e políticas sociais no Brasil: Contribuições ao debate sobre vinculação orçamentária. Revista Katálysis, 21, 76-85.
https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-02592018v21n1p76
[23]
Roberts, M. (2016). The Long Depression: How It Happened, Why It Happened, and What Happens Next. Haymarket Books.
[24]
Roberts, M. (2018). Marx 200: A Review of Marx’s Economics 200 Years after His Birth. Lulu.