Introduction:The end of pregnancy is a high-risk period for both mother and foetus.
Rigorous monitoring can prevent complications before delivery. Materials and
Method: We conducted a descriptive cross-sectional observational study. It
took place in the delivery room of the Teacher hospital Mother and Child of
Jeanne Ebori Fondation from the 01 October 2020 to 01 October 2021. All
patients followed at the Functional Investigation Centre (FIC) of the CHUMEFJE
and who gave birth in that same hospital were included. Data were collected on the basis of pregnancy diaries,
the fic register and delivery room registers. They were analysed using SPSS
Statistical Software. Results: During the period of our study, 4086
parturients arrived in the delivery room. Of these, 150 were followed up at the
FIC, giving a prevalence of 3.7%. The majority of parturients (48%) had
only one prenatal contact. 6 (4%)
patients underwent pelvic scans, and 4 (2.6%)
presented with a narrowed pelvis. A vaginal delivery was performed in 80% of
cases, and of the caesarean sections, 9 (30%) could be scheduled. The maternal
prognosis was marred by one post-partum complication of hypertension, and
newborns with poor adaptation to life outside the womb accounted for 3.3% of
cases. Conclusion: The Functional Investigation Centre makes it possible
to detect anomalies at the end of pregnancy with a view to better
planning of delivery.
References
[1]
Vogel, J.P., Habib, N.A., Souza, J.P., et al. (2013) Antenatal Care Packages with Reduced Visits and Perinatal Mortality: A Secondary Analysis of the WHO Antenatal Care Trial. Reproductive Health, 10, Article Number: 19.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-19
[2]
OMS (2016) Recommandations de l’OMS concernant les soins prénatals pour que la grossesse soit une expérience positive. Organisation Mondiale de la Santé, Genève.
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/2413/2016/11/WHO-RHR-16.12-fre.pdf
[3]
Baldé, I.S., Diallo, F.B., Diallo, M.H., et al. (2016) évaluation de la qualité de la dernière consultation prénatale dans une maternité périphérique à Conakry, Guinée. Revue de médecine périnatale, 8, 39-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12611-016-0354-z
[4]
Bil, N., Eggermann, V., Roueli, A., et al. (2015) étude de la faisabilité et de la valorisation de l’échographie focalisée dans un cadre d’explorations fonctionnelles extra-hospitalières pour des grossesses à risque. Journal de Gynécologie Obstétrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, 45, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgyn.2015.02.004
[5]
Haute Autorité de le Santé (HAS) (2007) Suivi et orientation des femmes enceintes en fonction des situations à risque identifiées-recommandation pour la pratique clinique-mise à jour. http://www.cfef.org/archives/bricabrac/suivigrossesse.pdf
[6]
Sima Ole, B., Bang Ntamack, J., Obame, R., et al. (2017) Utérus cicatriciel: Aspects épidémiologiques et mode d’accouchement à la maternité du CHU d’Owendo (Gabon). Bull Med Owendo, 15, 45-51.
[7]
Zedini, R., Bannour, R., Bannour, I., et al. (2020) L’accouchement des grossesses gémellaires et pronostic materno-foetal dans un centre universitaire tunisien de niveau 3: Etude rétrospective à propos 399 cas. Pan African Medical Journal, 36, 237.
https://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2020.36.237.19179
[8]
Ngom, P.M., Ndiaye-Gueye, M.D., El Hadi, W., et al. (2014) Les hémorragies du post-partum immédiat à l’Hôpital Principal de Dakar: Aspects épidémiologiques, biologiques, pronostiques et thérapeutiques. Journal de la SAGO, 15, 6-11.
[9]
Bang Ntamack, J.A., Mayi Tsonga, S., Sima Ole, B., et al. (2013) Besoins obstétricaux non couverts: Cas de la césarienne au Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Libreville. Rev Chir Afr Centr, 1, 25-28.
[10]
Minkobame, U., Assoumou Obiang, P., Sima Ole, B., et al. (2018) Césienne en urgence au CHU de Libreville: Indications et délai selon la classification de Robson. Guinean OB Gy Journal, 13, 19-25.
[11]
Cissé, C.-T., Ngom, P.-M., Guissé, A., et al. (2004) Thinking about Evolution Caesarean Section Rate at University Teaching Hospital of Dakar between 1992 and 2001. Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 32, 201-217.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gyobfe.2003.12.013