全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

A Geometric Model of Self-Organization and Its Significance to Societal Dysfunction

DOI: 10.4236/ojpp.2024.141007, PP. 82-92

Keywords: Infinity, Paradox, Rationalism, Logic, Hardy’s Paradox, Bell’s Inequality, Social Dysfunction, Self-Organization, Geometry

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

A toy geometric model applies the general principles of self-organization and stationary action principles in a Cartesian two-dimensional framework to represent an infinitely contained universal state. The geometry purposefully incorporates inconsistency, representing paradoxical structure, and receives validation by accurately predicting the experimental outcomes in key quantum experiments. The model also conjectures its dynamic format beyond the two-dimensional limit of the geometry. The second part of the paper adapts the model’s framework to discuss human social structure. The conjecture is that in the first order, the statements claiming universal truth devolve into a dualism of perspectives paradoxically conjoined. The framework of paradoxical inconsistency found in formal arguments of logic and mathematics applies in all spheres, from the structure of Nature to human rationalism, when attempting to conclude absolute truth. Therein lies a primary causative source of dysfunction in the logic and beliefs adopted as absolute truths in human society. The argument extends that, analogous to quantum entanglement, the relationship between rationalism and belief is entangled in the search for absolute universal truth.

References

[1]  Aharonov, Y., Botero, A., Popescu, S., Reznik, B., & Tollaksen, J. (2002). Revisiting Hardy’s Paradox: Counterfactual Statements, Real Measurements, Entanglement and Weak Values. Physics Letters A, 301, 130-138.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9601(02)00986-6
[2]  Gill, D. (2023d). Dimensional Boundaries: A Novel about the Impossible. Friesen Press.
https://www.dimensionalboundaries.com/
[3]  Gill, D. C. (2023a). The Mechanism of Paradox in the Structures of Logic, Mathematics, and Physics. Open Journal of Philosophy, 13, 155-170.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2023.132010
[4]  Gill, D. C. (2023b). The Limit to Rationalism in the Immaculately Nonordered Universe. Open Journal of Philosophy, 13, 586-597.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2023.133038
[5]  Gill, D. C. (2023c). The Universal Structure in the Moebius Band. Open Journal of Philosophy, 13, 787-795.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2023.134052
[6]  Gleick, J. (1993). Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman. Vintage Books.
[7]  Herbert, N. (1985). Quantum Reality: Beyond the New Physics. Anchor Books.
[8]  Lundeen, J. S., & Steinberg, A. M. (2008). Experimental Joint Weak Measurement on a Photon Pair as a Probe of Hardy’s Paradox. Quantum Physics.
https://arxiv.org/abs/0810.4229
[9]  Pamuła, H. (2023). Right Triangle Side and Angle Calculator.
https://www.omnicalculator.com/math/right-triangle-side-angle
[10]  Wikipedia Contributors. (2023a, November 29). Thought Experiment. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Thought_experiment&oldid=1187524362
[11]  Wikipedia Contributors. (2023b, August 31). Hardy’s Paradox. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hardy%27s_paradox&oldid=1173147978
[12]  Wikipedia Contributors. (2023c, October 27). Self-Organization. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Self-organization&oldid=1182188038
[13]  Wikipedia Contributors. (2023d, December 3). Stationary-Action Principle. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Stationary-action_principle&oldid=1188093633
[14]  Wikipedia Contributors. (2023e, November 10). Double-Slit Experiment. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Double-slit_experiment&oldid=1184467232
[15]  Wikipedia Contributors. (2023f, December 4). Russell’s Paradox. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Russell%27s_paradox&oldid=1188302527
[16]  Wikipedia Contributors. (2023g, July 14). Bell’s Theorem. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Bell%27s_theorem&oldid=1165392242
[17]  Wikipedia Contributors. (2023h, November 28). Negative Probability. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Negative_probability&oldid=1187390052
[18]  Wikipedia Contributors. (2023i, December 10). Infinity. In Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Infinity&oldid=1189152140

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133