全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Application of Sigma Metric Analysis to Evaluate the Performance of the Biochemistry Analytical System in a Medical Biology Laboratory in C?te d’Ivoire

DOI: 10.4236/jasmi.2024.141002, PP. 14-21

Keywords: Six Sigma, Qualities Controls, Bias, Imprecision, Total Allowable Error

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

Introduction: The Six Sigma methodology is an opportunity for a better understanding of the performance of analytical methods and for a better adaptation of the quality control management policy of the medical biology laboratory. Using the sigma metric, this study assessed the performance of the Biochemistry analytical system of a medical biology laboratory in Côte d'Ivoire. Methods: Six Sigma methodology was applied to 3 analytes (alanine aminotransferase, glucose and creatinine). Performance indicators such as measurement imprecision and bias were determined based on the results of internal and external quality controls. The sigma number was calculated using the total allowable error values proposed by Ricos et al. Results: For both control levels, ALT had a sigma number greater than 6 (7.6 for normal control and 7.9 for pathological control). However, low sigma numbers, less than or equal to 2 for creatinine (1.4 for normal control and 2 for pathological control) and less than 1 for glucose were found. Conclusion: This study revealed good analytical performance of ALT from the point of view of 6 sigma analysis. However, modifications to the overall quality control procedure for glucose and creatinine are needed to improve their analytical performance. The study should be extended to the entire laboratorys analytes in order to modify the strategies of quality control procedures based on metric analysis for an overall improvement in analytical performance.

References

[1]  OMS (2023) Laboratory Quality Stepwise Implementation Tool.
https://extranet.who.int/lqsi/fr/node/1055
[2]  Westgard, J.O. (2013) Statistical Quality Control Procedures. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 33, 111-124.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cll.2012.10.004
[3]  Iqbal, S. and Mustansar, T. (2017) Application of Sigma Metrics Analysis for the Assessment and Modification of Quality Control Program in the Clinical Chemistry Laboratory of a Tertiary Care Hospital. Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, 32, 106-109.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12291-016-0565-x
[4]  Westgard, J.O., Burnett, R.W. and Bowers, G.N. (1990) Quality Management Science in Clinical Chemistry: A Dynamic Framework for Continuous Improvement of Quality. Clinical Chemistry, 36, 1712-1716.
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/36.10.1712
[5]  Westgard, J.O., Seehafer, J.J. and Barry, P.L. (1994) Allowable Imprecision for Laboratory Tests Based on Clinical and Analytical Test Outcome Criteria. Clinical Chemistry, 40, 1909-1914.
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/40.10.1909
[6]  Westgard, J.O., Seehafer, J.J. and Barry, P.L. (1994) European Specifications for Imprecision and Inaccuracy Compared with Operating Specifications That Assure the Quality Required by US CLIA Proficiency-Testing Criteria. Clinical Chemistry, 40, 1228-1232.
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/40.7.1228
[7]  Coskun, A. (2007) Six Sigma and Laboratory Consultation. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 45, 121-123.
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/CCLM.2007.023/html
[8]  Mhone, A.O. and Jin, J. (2021) Deployment of Lean Six Sigma and KAIZEN Techniques: A Case Study of the Concrete Production Plant for the 750 MW (5 * 150 MW) Kafue Gorge Lower Hydro Power Project. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 11, 1052-1069.
https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2021.1110064
[9]  Scherrer, F., Bouilloux, J.P., Calendini, O., Chamard, D. and Cornu, F. (2017) Interest and Limits of the Six Sigma Methodology in Medical Laboratory. Annales de Biologie Clinique (Paris), 75, 107-113.
https://doi.org/10.1684/abc.2016.1216
[10]  Ricós, C., Alvarez, V. and Cava, F.J.V. (1999) Current Databases on Biological Variation: Pros, Cons and Progress. Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation, 59, 491-500.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00365519950185229
[11]  Westgard, Q.C. (2012) Biologic Variation and Desirable Specifications for QC—Westgard.
https://www.westgard.com/guest17.htm
[12]  Afrifa, J., Gyekye, S.A., Owiredu, W.K.B.A., Ephraim, R.K.D., Essien-Baidoo, S., Amoah, S., et al. (2015) Application of Sigma Metrics for the Assessment of Quality Control in Clinical Chemistry Laboratory in Ghana: A Pilot Study. Journal of the Nigeria Medical Association, 56, 54-58.
https://doi.org/10.4103/0300-1652.149172
[13]  Klee, G.G. (2010) Establishment of Outcome-Related Analytic Performance Goals. Clinical Chemistry, 56, 714-722.
https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2009.133660
[14]  Westgard, J.O. (2011) Six Sigma Risk Analysis. Westgard QC Inc Edition, Madison.
[15]  Westgard, J.O. (2006) Six Sigma Quality Design and Control.
[16]  Westgard, J.O. and Stein, B. (1997) Automated Selection of Statistical Quality-Control Procedures to Assure Meeting Clinical or Analytical Quality Requirements. Clinical Chemistry, 43, 400-403.
https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/43.2.400
[17]  Hens, K., Berth, M., Armbruster, D. and Westgard, S. (2014) Sigma Metrics Used to Assess Analytical Quality of Clinical Chemistry Assays: Importance of the Allowable Total Error (TEa) Target. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, 52, 973-980.
https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2013-1090/html
[18]  Jones, G.R.D. (2004) Reevaluation of the Power of Error Detection of Westgard Multirules. Clinical Chemistry, 50, 762-764.
https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2003.025585

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133