全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

Corruption: A Brief Review of Theoretical Approach

DOI: 10.4236/blr.2024.152039, PP. 624-637

Keywords: Corruption, Governments, Strategies

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This paper provides a theoretical review of a topic that has become ubiquitous on the global agenda: corruption. An issue constantly present on the political agendas of countries integrated into the global economy, the study of aspects related to the phenomenon, its characteristics, and modalities, therefore, proves to be of utmost importance for the adequate understanding of the role of democratic governments, their relationship with society, as well as the strategies for addressing this problem. Corruption is a phenomenon that gains public visibility in democratic regimes because in such regimes there are freedom of press, freedom of expression, free party organizations, and opposition to the governments on duty. However, although democracy has the merit of not hiding corruption, not confronting and not containing acts that are harmful to the public interests can be lethal to democracy itself by generating autocratic governments that place themselves above political institutions (Ribeiro, 2000). Public distrust towards State institutions, and its negative effect on society’s appreciation of democracy, appear in the Report Can democracy deliver results? produced by the Open Society Barometer of Open Society (2023). In such research, carried out in 30 countries with more than 5 billion inhabitants, corruption, in terms of social concern, overcomes structural problems such as climate change, poverty and inequality, when respondents were asked about the most important challenges in their countries. This problem was seen as a priority in Africa, Latin America, and a top priority in Russia. Specific research with citizens from Latin America and the Caribbean also reveals citizens’ discontent with the ability of politicians and democracy to meet expectations of good public policies, improved quality of life, and the way of governing (Zechmeister, Lupu, & Cohen, 2017). With the purpose of providing better conditions for the adequate understanding of corruption, this article seeks to systematize some of the main theoretical reflections on the subject, highlighting attempts to conceptualize and classify it, as well as some of the approaches developed with the aim of understanding its causes and devising strategies for its control.

References

[1]  Alt, J. E., & Lassen, D. D. (2003). The Political Economy of Institutions and Corruption in American States. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 15, 341-365.
[2]  Andvig, J. C. et al. (2000). Research on Corruption: A Policy Oriented Survey.
http://www.icgg.org/downloads/contribution07_andvig.pdf
[3]  Anechiarico, F., & Jacobs, J. (1996). The Pursuit of Absolute Integrity, How Corruption Control Makes Government Ineffective. The University of Chicago Press.
[4]  Ariely, D., & Gino, F. (2016). Dishonesty Explained: What Leads Moral People to Act Immorally. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The Social Psychology of Good and Evil (2nd ed., pp. 322-344). The Guilford Press.
[5]  Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. The Free Press.
[6]  Di Pietro, M. S. Z. (2000). Direito Administrativo (12th ed.). Atlas.
[7]  Filgueiras, F. (2008). Marcos teóricos da corrupção. In Avritzer, et al. (Eds.), Corrupção: Ensaios e críticas (pp. 353-361). Editora UFMG.
[8]  Filgueiras, F. (2009). A tolerância à corrupção do Brasil: Uma antinomia entre normas morais e prática social. Opinião Pública, 15, 386-421.
[9]  Filgueiras, F., & Aranha, A. L. M. (2011). Controle da corrupção e burocracia da linha de frente: Regras, discricionariedade e reformas no Brasil. Dados, 54, 349-387.
[10]  Holmes, L. (2015). Corruption: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.
[11]  Jacobs, J. (2000). Dilemmas of Corruption Control. In C. Fijnaut, & L. Huberts (Eds.), Corruption, Integrity and Law Enforcement. Springer.
[12]  Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A Review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15, 71-121.
[13]  Kaufmann, D. (1997). Corruption: The Facts. Foreign Policy, 107, 114-131.
[14]  Klitgaard, R. (1994). Controlling Corruption. University of California Press.
[15]  Klitgaard, R. (2008). A Holistic Approach to the Fight against Corruption.
https://scholar.cgu.edu/robert-klitgaard/wp-content/uploads/sites/22/2017/02/Holistic_Approach_1-08.pdf
[16]  Kwon, I. (2011). Motivation, Discretion and Corruption.
https://academic.oup.com/jpart/article/24/3/765/898098
[17]  La Porta, R. et al. (1997). Trust in Large Organizations. American Economic Review, 87, 33-338.
[18]  Lambsdorff, J. G. (2005). Consequences and Causes of Corruption: What Do We Know from a Cross-Section of Countries? Working Paper, University of Passau.
[19]  Mishra, A. (2006). Corruption, Hierarchies and Bureaucratic Structure. In S. Rose-Ackerman (Ed.), International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption (pp. 189-225). Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
[20]  Mo, P. H. (2001). Corruption and Economic Growth. Journal of Comparative Economics, 29, 66-79.
[21]  Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2006). Corruption: Diagnosis and Treatment. Journal of Democracy, 17, 86-99.
[22]  Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2024). Seven Arguments in Favour of Rethinking Corruption. Eucrim - Europian Law Forum, No. 3, 300-304.
https://eucrim.eu/articles/seven-arguments-in-favour-of-rethinking-corruption/
https://doi.org/10.30709/eucrim-2023-028
[23]  O’Donnell, G. (1998). Accountability horizontal e novas poliarquias. Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, 44, 27-54.
[24]  Open Society (2023). Open Society Barometer: Can Democracy Deliver?
https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/uploads/e6cd5a09-cd19-4587-aa06-368d3fc78917/open-society-barometer-can-democracy-deliver-20230911.pdf
[25]  Peruzzotti, E. (2008). Accountability. In L. Avritzer, et al. (Eds.), Corrupção: Ensaio e críticas (pp. 477-483). UFMG.
[26]  Pires, A. C. M. (2013). Manual de direito administrativo. Editora Atlas.
[27]  Przeworski, A. (1998). Democracia y representación. Revista del Clad Reforma y Democracia, No. 10, 7-44.
[28]  Ribeiro, R. J. (2000). Da política da Corrupção. In R. J. Ribeiro (Org.), A sociedade contra o social. Companhia das Letras.
[29]  Rose-Ackerman, S. (1999). Frontmatter. In: Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139175098
[30]  Rose-Ackerman, S., & Truex, R. (17 February 2012). Corruption and Policy Reform. Yale Law & Economics Research Paper No. 444.
https://ssrn.com/abstract=2007152
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2007152
[31]  Serra, D. (2006). Empirical Determinants of Corruption: A Sensitivity Analysis. Public Choice, 126, 225-256.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-006-0286-4
[32]  Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the World: Causes, Consequences, Scope and Cures (Vol. 45). IMF Staff Papers, Washington, D.C.
[33]  Treisman, D. (2000). The Causes of Corruption: Across-National Study. Journal of Public Economics, 76, 3.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00092-4
[34]  Wei, S. (1998). Corruption in Economic Development: Beneficial Grease, Minor Annoyance, or Major Obstacle?
https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/175291468765621959/129529322_20041117144615/additional/multi-page.pdf
[35]  Zechmeister, E. J., Lupu, N., & Cohen, M. J. (2017). Democracy and Governance in the Americas: Key Findings from LAPOP’s Americas Barometer. Latin American Public Opinion Project.
https://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/insights/ITB030en.pdf

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133