全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

An Empirical Study on the Impact of Port on Hinterland Economy

DOI: 10.4236/me.2024.158039, PP. 764-776

Keywords: Hinterland Economy, Shanghai Port, Vector Autoregression Model, Impulse Response Function, Variance Decomposition

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

This study focuses on Shanghai Port as the subject of investigation, employing measurement methods such as co-integration theory and Granger causality test, impulse response analysis, and variance analysis. It utilizes data from 2000 to 2022 and selects indicators related to both Shanghai Port and the economic development of its hinterland in order to examine their relationship. The research results indicate that there is a stable dynamic equilibrium relationship between Shanghai Port and hinterland economy development. In the short term, Shanghai Port has a certain promoting effect on hinterland economic growth; however, in the long term, there is no significant evidence to suggest that the growth of the hinterland economy significantly promotes the development of Shanghai Port. Through variance decomposition analysis, it can be observed that the development of Shanghai Port has a stronger influence on the Actual Utilization of Foreign Capital in its hinterland compared to GDP and the Value-added of Tertiary Industry. Building upon these results, this paper also offers recommendations for fostering interactive development between Shanghai Port and its hinterland economy, which can serve as valuable guidance for relevant stakeholders and decision-makers.

References

[1]  Bottasso, A., Conti, M., Ferrari, C., & Tei, A. (2014). Ports and Regional Development: A Spatial Analysis on a Panel of European Regions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 65, 44-55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.006
[2]  Cong, L., Zhang, D., Wang, M., Xu, H., & Li, L. (2020). The Role of Ports in the Economic Development of Port Cities: Panel Evidence from China. Transport Policy, 90, 13-21.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.02.003
[3]  Coppens, F., Lagneaux, F., Meersman, H., Sellekaerts, N., van de Voorde, E., van Gastel, G. et al. (2007). Economic Impact of Port Activity: A Disaggregate Analysis—The Case of Antwerp. SSRN Electronic Journal, 138, 944-949.
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1687569
[4]  Danielis, R., & Gregori, T. (2013). An Input-Output-Based Methodology to Estimate the Economic Role of a Port: The Case of the Port System of the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region, Italy. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 15, 222-255.
https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2013.1
[5]  Jouili, T. A., & Allouche, M. A. (2016). Impacts of Seaport Investment on the Economic Growth. PROMET—Traffic & Transportation, 28, 365-370.
https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v28i4.1933
[6]  Jun, W. K., Lee, M., & Choi, J. Y. (2018). Impact of the Smart Port Industry on the Korean National Economy Using Input-Output Analysis. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 480-493.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.004
[7]  Jung, B. (2011). Economic Contribution of Ports to the Local Economies in Korea. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 27, 1-30.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s2092-5212(11)80001-5
[8]  Santos, A. M. P., Salvador, R., Dias, J. C. Q., & Soares, C. G. (2018). Assessment of Port Economic Impacts on Regional Economy with a Case Study on the Port of Lisbon. Maritime Policy & Management, 45, 684-698.
https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2018.1471536
[9]  Schempf, F. J. (2008). New Study Finds Port Fourchon “Vital” to US Economy. Offshore, 63, 74-76.
[10]  Seabrooke, W., Hui, E. C. M., Lam, W. H. K., & Wong, G. K. C. (2003). Forecasting Cargo Growth and Regional Role of the Port of Hong Kong. Cities, 20, 51-64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0264-2751(02)00097-5

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133