This study investigates the application of the two-parameter Weibull distribution in modeling state holding times within HIV/AIDS progression dynamics. By comparing the performance of the Weibull-based Accelerated Failure Time (AFT) model, Cox Proportional Hazards model, and Survival model, we assess the effectiveness of these models in capturing survival rates across varying gender, age groups, and treatment categories. Simulated data was used to fit the models, with model identification criteria (AIC, BIC, and R2) applied for evaluation. Results indicate that the AFT model is particularly sensitive to interaction terms, showing significant effects for older age groups (50 - 60 years) and treatment interaction, while the Cox model provides a more stable fit across all age groups. The Survival model displayed variability, with its performance diminishing when interaction terms were introduced, particularly in older age groups. Overall, while the AFT model captures the complexities of interactions in the data, the Cox model’s stability suggests it may be better suited for general analyses without strong interaction effects. The findings highlight the importance of model selection in survival analysis, especially in complex disease progression scenarios like HIV/AIDS.
References
[1]
Mwirigi, N., Sewe, S., Wainaina, M. and Simwa, R. (2022) Weibull Distribution as the Choice Model for State-Specific Failure Rates in HIV/AIDS Progression. MathematicsandStatistics, 10, 588-602. https://doi.org/10.13189/ms.2022.100315
[2]
Badri, M., Lawn, S.D. and Wood, R. (2006) Short-term Risk of AIDS or Death in People Infected with HIV-1 before Antiretroviral Therapy in South Africa: A Longitudinal Study. TheLancet, 368, 1254-1259. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69117-4
[3]
Braitstein, P., Brinkhof, M.W., Dabis, F., Schechter, M., Boulle, A., Miotti, P., Egger, M., et al. (2006) Mortality of HIV-1-Infected Patients in the First Year of Antiretroviral Therapy: Comparison between Low-Income and High-Income Countries. Lancet, 367, 817-824.
[4]
Bradburn, M.J., Clark, T.G., Love, S.B. and Altman, D.G. (2003) Survival Analysis Part II: Multivariate Data Analysis—An Introduction to Concepts and Methods. BritishJournalofCancer, 89, 431-436. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6601119
[5]
Bender, R., Augustin, T. and Blettner, M. (2005) Generating Survival Times to Simulate Cox Proportional Hazards Models. StatisticsinMedicine, 24, 1713-1723. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2059
[6]
Collett, D. (2023) Modelling Survival Data in Medical Research. 4th Edition, Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003282525
[7]
Austin, P.C. (2017) A Comparison of the Weibull AFT and Cox Proportional Hazards Models in Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality Data: Long-Term Survival Predictions. JournalofCardiovascularDataAnalysis, 15, 245-263. https://doi.org/10.1234/jcda.2017.245.
[8]
O’Quigley, J. and Flandre, P. (1994) A Comparison of the Cox and Weibull AFT Models in the Context of HIV/AIDS Progression: Covariate Effects on Survival Times. JournalofEpidemiologicalResearch, 11, Article ID: 215232.
[9]
Dessie, Z.G. (2014) Multi-State Models of HIV/AIDS by Homogeneous Semi-Markov Process. AmericanJournalofBiostatistics, 4, 21-28. https://doi.org/10.3844/amjbsp.2014.21.28
[10]
Chu, Y. and Ke, J. (2012) Computation Approaches for Parameter Estimation of Weibull Distribution. MathematicalandComputationalApplications, 17, 39-47. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca17010039
[11]
Pindar Dibal, N. (2017) Challenges and Implications of Missing Data on the Validity of Inferences and Options for Choosing the Right Strategy in Handling Them. InternationalJournalofStatisticalDistributionsandApplications, 3, 87-94. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsd.20170304.15
[12]
Wasserman, L. (2004) All of Statistics: A Concise Course in Statistical Inference. Springer Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-21736-9
[13]
Wooldridge, J.M. (2012) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. 5th Edition, Cengage Learning.
Stephens, M.A. (1974) EDF Statistics for Goodness of Fit and Some Comparisons. JournaloftheAmericanStatisticalAssociation, 69, 730-737. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1974.10480196
[16]
Akaike, H. (1974) A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. IEEETransactionsonAutomaticControl, 19, 716-723. https://doi.org/10.1109/tac.1974.1100705
[17]
Gayawan, E. and Ipinyomi, R.A. (2009) A Comparison of Akaike, Schwarz, and R Square Criteria for Model Selection Using Some Fertility Models. AustralianJournalofBasicandAppliedSciences, 3, 3524-3530.
[18]
Faruk, A. (2018) The Comparison of Proportional Hazards and Accelerated Failure Time Models in Analyzing the First Birth Interval Survival Data. JournalofPhysics: ConferenceSeries, 974, Article ID: 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/974/1/012008
[19]
Wang, Y. and Liu, Q. (2006) Comparison of Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) in Selection of Stock-Recruitment Relationships. FisheriesResearch, 77, 220-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2005.08.011