全部 标题 作者
关键词 摘要

OALib Journal期刊
ISSN: 2333-9721
费用:99美元

查看量下载量

相关文章

更多...

The Effect of Achievement Goal Orientation on the Online English Learning Engagement of College Students

DOI: 10.4236/ojml.2024.145053, PP. 1015-1024

Keywords: College English, Achievement Goal Orientation, Learning Engagement, Online Learning

Full-Text   Cite this paper   Add to My Lib

Abstract:

The key to effective language learning is to improve students’ learning engagement. This paper explored the impact of students’ achievement goal orientation on online English learning engagement in an online teaching environment through a questionnaire survey of 282 college students. The results showed that college students’ online English learning engagement was generally at an above-average level, but their behavioral engagement needed to be improved; achievement goal orientation had a significant impact on online English learning engagement. Among them, mastery-approach goals and performance-approach goals could directly and positively predict college students’ online English learning engagement, while mastery-avoidance goals and performance-avoidance goals could directly and negatively predict college students’ online English learning engagement. By analyzing the relationship between achievement goal orientation and online English learning engagement, it could not only broaden the theoretical research results on online learning engagement, but also provide a reference for improving the effectiveness of online teaching.

References

[1]  Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a Psychology of Human Agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164-180.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
[2]  Bates, R., & Khasawneh, S. (2007). Self-Efficacy and College Students’ Perceptions and Use of Online Learning Systems. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 175-191.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.04.004
[3]  Cho, M., & Castañeda, D. A. (2019). Motivational and Affective Engagement in Learning Spanish with a Mobile Application. System, 81, 90-99.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.008
[4]  Dyment, J., Stone, C., & Milthorpe, N. (2020). Beyond Busy Work: Rethinking the Measurement of Online Student Engagement. Higher Education Research & Development, 39, 1440-1453.
https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1732879
[5]  Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and Avoidance Achievement Goals and Intrinsic Motivation: A Mediational Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 461-475.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
[6]  Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 Achievement Goal Framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.80.3.501
[7]  Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An Approach to Motivation and Achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 5-12.
https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.1.5
[8]  Ferrell, A. (2012). Classroom Social Environments, Motivational Beliefs, and Student Engagement. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California.
[9]  Gong, C. H., Li, Q., & Gong, Y. (2018). Research on Learning Engagement in Smart Learning Environment. Journal of Audiovisual Education Research, No. 6, 83-89.
[10]  Higher Education Foreign Language Teaching Steering Committee of the Ministry of Education (2020). College English Teaching Guide (2020 Edition). Higher Education Press.
[11]  Huang, H. Y., Xu, G. C., & Fu, Y. (2017). The Relationship between College Students’ Achievement Goal Orientation and Learning Engagement: The Mediating Role of Time Management Tendency. Psychological Exploration, 37, 375-379.
[12]  Huang, Q. S., Li, Y. B., & Ren, Y. G. et al. (2019). Research on the Influence of College Students’ Achievement Goal Orientation on Online Learning Engagement: The Mediating Role of Academic Procrastination. Modern Distance Education, No. 5, 77-85.
[13]  Kanuka, H. (2005). An Exploration into Facilitating Higher Levels of Learning in a Text-Based Internet Learning Environment Using Diverse Instructional Strategies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, JCMC1032.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00256.x
[14]  Lam, S., Wong, B. P. H., Yang, H., & Liu, Y. (2013). Understanding Student Engagement with a Contextual Model. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 403-419). Springer.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_19
[15]  Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New Conceptual Frameworks for Student Engagement Research, Policy, and Practice. Review of Educational Research, 83, 432-479.
https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891
[16]  Li, M., & Zhang, H. Y. (2020). Talking About Teaching during the Fight against the Epidemic. China Audio-Visual Education, No. 4, 8-15.
[17]  Liu, B., Zhang, W. L., & Liu, J. L. (2017). Research on the Influence of Teacher Support on Online Learners’ Learning Engagement. Audio-Visual Education Research, 38, 63-68, 80.
[18]  Liu, C., Wang, P., & Tai, S. D. (2016). An Analysis of Student Engagement Patterns in Language Learning Facilitated by Web 2.0 Technologies. ReCALL, 28, 104-122.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s095834401600001x
[19]  McWhaw, K., & Abrami, P. C. (2001). Student Goal Orientation and Interest: Effects on Students’ Use of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26, 311-329.
https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2000.1054
[20]  Mega, C., Ronconi, L., & De Beni, R. (2014). What Makes a Good Student? How Emotions, Self-Regulated Learning, and Motivation Contribute to Academic Achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 121-131.
https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033546
[21]  Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring Engagement in Tasks in the Language Classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50-72.
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0267190515000094
[22]  Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. (2011). Agency as a Fourth Aspect of Students’ Engagement during Learning Activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257-267.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.05.002
[23]  Sun, J. C., & Rueda, R. (2012). Situational Interest, Computer Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulation: Their Impact on Student Engagement in Distance Education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, 191-204.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01157.x
[24]  Tas, Y. (2016). The Contribution of Perceived Classroom Learning Environment and Motivation to Student Engagement in Science. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 31, 557-577.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-016-0303-z
[25]  Tseng, W., Liou, H., & Chu, H. (2020). Vocabulary Learning in Virtual Environments: Learner Autonomy and Collaboration. System, 88, Article 102190.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102190
[26]  Wang, Y. F., Fang, L. L., & Ling, W. Q. (2001a). The Relationship between Achievement Goal Orientation and Social Cognition. Psychological Dynamics, No. 3, 237-241.
[27]  Wang, Y. F., Fang, L. L., & Ling, W. Q. (2001b). A Review of Research on Achievement Goal Orientation Theory. Psychological Science, 24, 85-86.
[28]  Xu, J. F., & Long, Z. B. (2020). Research on Agency in Foreign Language Teaching. Journal of PLA Foreign Languages University, No. 5, 93-100.
[29]  Yang, G., & Dai, Z. H. (2021). Analysis of the Composition and Influencing Paths of College Students’ English Online Learning Investment. Foreign Languages and Foreign Language Teaching, No. 4, 113-123.
[30]  Zhou, X. L., Li, H., & Wang, J. J. (2022). Research on the Achievement Differences of English Major Students from the Perspective of Motivation and Its Implications for Talent Training. Foreign Languages in China, 19, 69-78.

Full-Text

Contact Us

service@oalib.com

QQ:3279437679

WhatsApp +8615387084133