A propósito da "ordem" como atributo da "maneira" em Montaigne

montaigne, in "de l'art de conferer", discusses the criteria to distinguish men according to their capabilities (suffisances). the "manner" of discussing is central to this issue and among its qualities "order" distinguishes itself. the "order" is presented to us by the exposition of its deviations: foolishness ("sottise") and obstinacy ("opiniastreté"). these inadequacies represent both dogmatism and an erroneous way of using knowledge based on memory. we intend to show how order is founded on a kind of judgment which assimilates and penetrates matters and subjects - being it the only way to assure the necessary connection to adequately develop the conversation ("conference").